Haryana

Karnal

CC/289/2020

Pankaj Malhotra, Advocate - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited - Opp.Party(s)

S.K. Malhotra

06 Oct 2020

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                     Complaint No.289 of 2020

                                                                     Date of instt. 7.8.2020

                                                                     Date of Decision 06.10.2020

 

Pankaj Malhotra Advocate son of Shri S.K.Malhotra, Advocate Chamber No.48, Lawyers Chamber Complex, Sector-12, Karnal. 

                                                                             …….Complainant

                                      Versus

 

1.       Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited through SDO (Operation) L-13, Sub Urban Division, Sector-12, Urban Estate, Karnal.

                                                                             …..Opposite party

2.       Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited through SE (Operation), Sector-12, Urban Estate, Karnal.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act.

 

Before        Sh. Jaswant Singh……President.  

          Sh.Vineet Kaushik ………..Member

                    Dr. Rekha Chaudhary…….Member

 

 Present:   Complainant in person.

                   Shri Manoj Kumar Sachdeva, counsel for OPs.

         

          Today the case was fixed for evidence of complainant. No evidence on behalf of complainant is present. Learned counsel for OPs made a statement that the OPs (UHBVNL) have rectified the consumption bill of the complainant with respect to chamber No.48, as per which ₹1819/- is to be paid by the complainant for the reading till 22.09.2020. Calculation of the department is placed on record as Ex.OP1. The OPs shall not claim any further amount except the amount stated above regarding chamber No.48, belonging to the complainant.

          On the other hand, complainant also suffered his separate statement to the effect that in view of the statement made by learned counsel for OPs, he withdraws the present complaint.

                In view of statement of complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Dated:06.10.2020

 

(Vineet Kaushik)           (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)                President,

     Member                           Member                     District Consumer Disputes 

                                                                          Redressal Commission, Karnal.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.