Haryana

Karnal

554/2012

Jasbir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Jagmal Singh

13 Aug 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 554/2012
 
1. Jasbir Singh
karnal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited.
Karnal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C. Sharma PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No.554 of 2012

                                                               Date of instt.22.11.2012

                                                               Date of decision: 25.5.2015

 

Jasbir Singh son of late Sh.Mehar Singh resident of village Rajepur tehsil and district Karnal.

 

                                                                   ………Complainant.

                   Versus

 

1.Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited through Sub Divisional Officer (OP) Sub- Division Indri,  tehsil  Indri District Karnal.

2.Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited through Sub Divisional Officer (OP) Sub Division Garhi Birbal, tehsil Indri  and District Karnal.

3.Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited through its Managing Director, Shakti Bhawan, Sector 6,  Panchkula.

4.Joginder Singh son of late Sh.Chamel Singh resident of village Rajepur tehsil Indri District Karnal.

 

                                                                        ……… Opposite Parties.

5.Dharam Pal son of Sh.Mehar Singh resident of Rajepur tehsil Indri District Karnal.

                                                          ………..Proforma Opposite Party.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.K.C.Sharma……. President.

                   Smt.Shashi Sharma….Member.                

 

 Present        Sh.Jagmal Singh Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh.P.S.Bhatti Advocate for the OP No.1 to 3.

                   Sh.Rajesh Kamboj Advocate for the OP No.4.

                   None for the OP No.5.

ORDER:                   

                      Sh.Jagmal Singh Advocate for the complainant has made a statement for withdrawal of the complaint submitting that his grievance has been redressed. His statement has been recorded separately.                    

 2.                Therefore, in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance. 

Announced
dated:25.05.2015                                                                            

                                                              (K.C.Sharma)

                                                             President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                   (Smt.Shashi Sharma)

                             Member.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C. Sharma]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.