Haryana

Karnal

32ex/2010

Sahab Singh S/o Jagir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited., Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Rajbir Gupta

11 Nov 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Execution Application No. 32ex/2010
In
690/2007
 
1. Sahab Singh S/o Jagir Singh
V. Dera Pipalwali, Teh. & Distt. Karnal
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited., Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam ltd
Shakti Bhawan, Sec-6, Panchkula., Gharaunda Distt. Karnal
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Rajbir Gupta , Advocate
For the Respondent: G.S. Arora, Advocate
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Execution No. 32 of 2010        

                                                            Date of instt.16.02.2010

                                                          Date of decision: 23.02.2015

 

Sahab Singh son of the Jagir Singh resident of Dera Pipalwali, Tehsil and Distt. Karnal.

                                                                 ………Complainant.

                                                Vs.

  1. The Managing Director, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Sector-6, Shakti Bhawan, Panchkula.
  2. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Sub Division Gharaunda, Distt. Karnal though its Sub Divisional Officer.                                                                                                                                 ………Opposite Parties.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal……. President.

                   Sh.Subhash Chander Sharma…………..Member.

 

 Present       None for DH.

                   Sh. G.S. Arora, Advocate for the JDs.

 

ORDER:

                  

                    The case called several times since morning. None has appeared on behalf of the Decree holder. It is already 4.15PM. Further wait is not justified. Therefore, the present execution petition is dismissed in default. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.  

 

Announced:

23.02.2015.                                                                                                                                                     

                                                                             (Subhash Goyal)

                                                                               President,

(Subhash Chander Sharma )                  District Consumer Disputes  Member                                   Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.