Haryana

Karnal

115/2013

Raj Pal S/o Ranjit Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited., Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam ltd.,Uttar Haryana Bija - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. K.S. Mandhan

17 Oct 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 115/2013
 
1. Raj Pal S/o Ranjit Singh
V. Kalsora, Teh. Indri, Distt. karnal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited., Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam ltd.,Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam ltd
Shakti Bhawan, Sec-6, Panchkulla., Modal Town karnal., V. Garhi Birbal , Distt. Karnal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No. 115 of 2013                                                                                                         Date of instt.  04.03.2013

                                                          Date of decision: 27.03.2015

 

Raj Pal son of Sh. Ranjit Singh resident of village Kalsora, Tehsil Indri, Distt. Karnal.

                                                                 ………Complainant.

                                                Vs.

  1. Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Ltd, Shakti Bhawan Panchkulla through its Managing Director.
  2. The XEN, Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nagam Ltd, Sub-Urban Sub Division No.1, Modal Town, Karnal.
  3. Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Ltd, Sub-Urban Sub-Division Garhi Birbal, Distt. Karnal, though its Sub Divisional Officer, Karnal.

………Opposite Parties.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal ………. President.

                   Smt. Shashi Sharma  ….……. Member.

 

 Present        None for the Complainant.

                   Sh. Pawan Kajal, Advocate for the Ops.

 

ORDER:

                   The case called several times since morning. None has appeared on behalf of the complainant. It is already 3.30 PM. Further wait is not justified. Therefore, the present complaint is dismissed in default. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.  

Announced:

27.03.2015.                                                                                                                                                     

                                                                                      (Subhash Goyal)

                                                                                            President,

             (Smt. Shashi Sharma )                                          District Consumer Disputes

                    (Member)                                                      Redressal Forum, Karnal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.