Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/1391/2014

Urmila Bajpai - Complainant(s)

Versus

UPPCL - Opp.Party(s)

Dilip Srivastava

27 Jul 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/1391/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. Urmila Bajpai
-
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. UPPCL
-
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh PRESIDENT
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

                                   UTTAR PRADESH, LUCKNOW

                                      APPEAL NO. 1391 OF 2014

           (Against the judgment/order dated 16-04-2014 in Complaint

          Case No.167/2009 of the District Consumer Forum, Sitapur)

 

Urmila Bajpai

W/o Ramesh Chand Bajpai

R/o. 33 Brahmapuri

Pargana Khairabad

Tehsil and District Sitapur  

                                                                            ...Appellant/Complainant

                                                     Vs.

Uttar Pradesh Corporation Limited

Vidyur Vitran Khand-I

Office situated at Rani Kothi Batasganj

Pargana Khairabad

Tehsil & District Sitapur

                                                            ...Respondent/Opposite Party

 

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH, PRESIDENT

HON’BLE MR. UDAI SHANKAR AWASTHI, MEMBER

 

For the Appellant        :       None appears.

For the Respondent     :            -

 

Dated : 27-07-2015

                                                  JUDGMENT

          MR. JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH, PRESIDENT(ORAL)

          This appeal is put up today. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant. This appeal was filed on 07-07-2014 against the impugned order dated 16-04-2014 and since then the appellant is being allowed regularly for taking steps and to remove the defects in the appeal but neither the steps have been taken; nor the defects have been removed and even the appellant is not present, which shows that the appellant is not interested in this appeal against the impugned order by which the complaint of the complainant was dismissed by the District Consumer Forum.

Hence this appeal is hereby dismissed in default of the appellant. 

 

 

                                                                              ( JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH )

                                                                                                             PRESIDENT

 

 

                         ( U S AWASTHI )

   MEMBER

            Pnt.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.