Haryana

Karnal

CC/322/2024

Poonam Devi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Kamal Kant Lodhi

03 Jul 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                   Complaint No.322 of 2024

                                                                     Date of instt.01.07.2024

                                                                     Date of Decision:03.07.2024

 

  1. Poonam Devi wife of late Sh. Sushil Kumar.
  2. Sheetal minor daughter of late Sh. Sushil Kumar.
  3. Armaan minor son of Sh. Sushil Kumar minor’s claimant No.2 & 3 being minor through their mother Smt. Poonam Devi (petitioner no.1) who is the natural guardian and next friend has got no adverse interest with the said minors, all residents of House no.345, Village Budha Khera, Tehsil and District Karnal.

 

                                                                                      …….Complainants.

                                                Versus

Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited, SCO-9, 1st floor, above Central Bank of India, Sector-10, Panchkula, through its Branch Manager (Insurer of Car bearing no.HR-05AZ-8595.

                                                                                      …..Opposite Party.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before       Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.   

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                   Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

 

Present: Sh. Kamal Kant Lodhi, Counsel for the Complainant.

                                           

       Complaint presented today. It be checked and registered.

       Learned counsel for the complainant has suffered his separate statement to effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint further and withdraws the same on technical ground and sought permission to file the fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law.     

              In view of the above statement the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies of the same. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:03.07.2024.                

                     President,      

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh)

   Member                   Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.