Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/15/2014

Mr.Praveen Kumar Benguluru - Complainant(s)

Versus

Univercell Tele communications India Pvt Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

25 Jan 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
CHENNAI (SOUTH)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/2014
 
1. Mr.Praveen Kumar Benguluru
Vetri Nagar, Chn -82.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Univercell Tele communications India Pvt Ltd.,
Alwarepet Chn -18.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML., PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   31.12.2013

                                                                        Date of Order :   25.01.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI(SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM M.A.M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

                 DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

 

C.C.NO.15/2014

            MONDAY THIS  25TH DAY OF JANUARY  2016     

Mr. Praveen Kumar Benguluru,

No.9, Mary Helen Street,

Vetri Nagar,

Chennai – 82. .                                             ..Complainant

                                            ..Vs..

The Authorized Signatory,

Univercell Telecommunication India Pvt. Ltd.,

No.281, T.T.K.Road,

Alwarpet,

Chennai 600 018.                                          ..Opposite party 

                                             

For the Complainant                    :   Party-in person.  

For the Opposite party                :    -

 

          Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.  Complaint is filed seeking direction against the opposite party to replace the defective mobile  and also to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- as mental agony and costs of the complaint  to the  complainant.

ORDER

THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM PRESIDENT

        No representation for complainant.  Fresh notice to opposite party not taken inspite of several adjournments, Hence complainant called absent, this compliant is dismissed for default.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

 
 
[ B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML.,]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.