Haryana

StateCommission

MA/109/2018

Rakesh Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

United India Insurance Company - Opp.Party(s)

Shri Sudhir Gupta, proxy counsel for Shri R.C. Gupta, counsel for the applicants

01 Jun 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

     

Miscellaneous Application No. 109 of 2018

          In Complaint No.216 of 2016

Date of Institution: 28.05.2018

Date of Decision: 01.06.2018

Rakesh Kumar son of Shri Sukhbir Singh.

                                      ..Complainant

Versus

1.      United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office at 06^th Floor, Krishi Bhawan, Narupatunga Road, Hudson Circule, Bengaluru.

2.      United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office at opposite S.P. Residence, near Reliance Fresh Showroom, Hisar, through its Senior Divisional Manager.

3.      Malik Toyota, 14.5 Milstone, NH-65, Chandigarh Road, Hisar, Haryana, through its authorized signatory.

 

                             ..Applicants-Opposite Parties

 

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Shri Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.

 

Present:     Shri Sudhir Gupta, proxy counsel for Shri R.C. Gupta, counsel for the applicants.

 

O R D E R 

NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL)

 

          Complaint No.216 of 2016 titled ‘Rakesh Kumar Versus United India Insurance Company and others’ was decided by this Commission vide order dated February 12^th, 2018.

2.      Shri Sudhir Gupta, counsel for the United India Insurance Company-applicants has filed this application stating that particulars of Rakesh Kumar-complainant were as under:

“Rakesh Kumar son of Shri Sukhbir Singh, resident of Village and Post Office Sukhmanpur Ratia, District Faridabad.”

The same particulars were mentioned in the complaint and order also. However, it is not District Faridabad rather Fatehabad as is gleaned from the paragraph No.15 of order dated February 12^th, 2018. So, it has been prayed that instead of District Faridabad, the correction to be made District Fatehabad.

3.      Submission being tenable. It is ordered that necessary correction be made.

4.      Disposed of accordingly.

 

June 01st,  2018

Balbir Singh Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

(D.R.)