Haryana

StateCommission

EA/6/2024

SMT. BANITA DEVI - Complainant(s)

Versus

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

MANOJ VASHISHTHA

30 May 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

 

Date of Institution:05.02.2024

Date of final hearing:30.05.2024

Date of pronouncement:30.05.2024

 

 

Execution Application No.06 of 2024 in

Consumer Complaint No.514 of 2017

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

Smt. Banita Devi wife of Shri Rajesh Kumar, R/o village Sanpka, Post Office Janaula, District Gurgaon.

 

…Decree Holder-Complainant.

 

Through counsel Mr. Manoj Vashishtha, Advocate

 

 

Versus

 

 

United India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office SCO-17-18, 1^st Floor, Sector-7, HUDA, Market Gurgaon, District Gurgaon through its Manager.

….Judgment Debtor-Opposite party.

Through counsel Mr.Satpal Dhamija, Advocate

 

 

Present:-    Mr. Manoj Vashishtha, counsel for the Decree Holder/complainant.

                   Mr. Satpal Dhamija, counsel for the Judgment Debtor/opposite party.

 

CORAM:   Mr. S.C. Kaushik, Member.
 

 

O R D E R

 

S.C. KAUSHIK, MEMBER:

 

                        Learned counsel for Judgment Debtor-Opposite party has appeared and suffered a statement which is reproduced as under:-

“I hand over a Demand Draft bearing No.931879 dated 13.05.2024 amounting to Rs.64,98,854/- issued in favour of Banita Devi (Decree Holder-complainant) as full payment to Shri Manoj Vashishtha, learned counsel for Decree Holder-complainant, in compliance of the order under execution”.

 

2.                On the other hand learned counsel for Decree Holder-complainant has also suffered a statement which is reproduced as under:-

“I received a Demand Draft bearing No.931879 dated 13.05.2024 amounting to Rs.64,98,854/- issued in favour of Banita Devi (Decree Holder-complainant) as full payment from Shri Satpal Dhamija, learned counsel for Judgment Debtor-Opposite party, in compliance of the order under execution. In view of this, I may be permitted to withdraw the present execution application being fully satisfied”.

 

3.                In view of the statements suffered by learned counsel for the parties, present execution application stands disposed of being fully satisfied.

4.                Application(s), pending, if any, stands disposed off in terms of the above mentioned order.

5.                A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019. The Order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the commission for the perusal of the parties.

6.                File be consigned to records.

 

 

 

Pronounced on 30^th May, 2024                                                   S.C. Kaushik

                                                                                                            Member

                                                                                                            Addl. Bench-III

R.K