Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/09/208

SHREE DHANJI DESAR SATRA & ORS - Complainant(s)

Versus

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SUNIL PATANKAR

12 Oct 2010

ORDER


BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
First Appeal No. A/09/208
(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/12/2008 in Case No. 126/2008 of District Thane)
1. SHREE DHANJI DESAR SATRA & ORS402 ADIGANESH BLDG EDALAJI ROAD CHARAI THANE (W)THANEMaharastra ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTDSADICCHA BLDG 2 ND FLOOR MANPADA ROAD BRANCH DOMBIVALI 421601THANEMaharastra ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBERHon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member
PRESENT :Mr.Rahul Mehta, Advocate for the Respondent 0

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Per Mr.S.R.Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

          This is an appeal filed by org. complainant since not satisfied with the part of the claimed awarded in his consumer complaint relating to the medi-claim.  It appears that he made a claim of `1,53,611/- and the Forum below considering the material placed before it was pleased to award Rs.80,000/- towards medi-claim policy and `5,000/- as additional compensation and `2,000/- as costs.

          We have carefully considered the impugned order as well as the material placed before us.  Forum below did not accept the case of the Insurance Company about suppression of material fact regarding previous ailment on the ground that the Insurance Company failed to justify such repudiation.  Thereafter, coming to the merit of the case, it categorically observed that the complainant had not filed any evidence on the basis of which the compensation could be properly assessed.  Therefore, on ad-hoc basis, claim of Rs.80,000/- was awarded.  Basically, it is the responsibility of the complainant to establish his case for compensation and the quantum thereof.  Since, no material or evidence as required under section 13(4) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was placed before the Forum below, what has been awarded by the Forum below cannot be faulted with particularly, in absence of any appeal filed by the Insurance Company.  Thus, we find the appeal devoid of any substance and holding accordingly, we pass the following order :-

                             -: ORDER :-

1.       Appeal is not admitted and stands dismissed accordingly.

2.       No order as to costs.

3.       Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 12 October 2010

[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode]PRESIDING MEMBER[Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar]Member