Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/469/2014

Dr.T.BHANUMATHI - Complainant(s)

Versus

UNITED BANKERS - Opp.Party(s)

30 Jan 2024

ORDER

  DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT: Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB           : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Tuesday  the 30^th day of January  2024

C.C.469/2014

Complainant

 

Dr. T. Bhanumathi,

Anugraha (HO),

Cherooty Nagar Housing Colony,

Calicut – 4.

Opposite Parties

 

1.   United Bankers,

Sudarshan Building,

Gandhi road, Calicut – 673 032,

Represented by its Joint Managing Partner

P.V. Rajan,

Residing at Nalinam,

Malaparamba, Calicut – 673 009.

2. P.V. Rajan,

Joint Managing Partner,

United Bakers,

Residing at Nalinam,

Malaparamba (PO), Calicut – 673009.

3. K.S Sudarshanan,

          S/o Shanmugham, Sreenidhi,

          Gandhi road, Kachei amsom and desom,

          Calicut.

4. P.V. Sharil Raj,

          Partner, united Bankers,

          Residing at Nalinam,

         Malaparamba,

         Calicut – 673 009.

5. P.V Nalini,

          Partner United Bankers,

         Residing at Nalinam,

         Malaparamba,

          Calicut – 673 009.

6.  P.V. Shalu Raj,

          Partner United Bankers,

          Residing at Vinod Bhavan,

          Ambalakunnu, Meppadi (PO),

           Wayanad.

7. P.V. Sheeja Raj,

         Partner, United Bankers,

          Residing at Suraj,

         Ashokapuram Housing Colony,

         Calicut -6.

8. K. Jayashree,

         Partner United Bankers,

         Residing at Sreenidhi,

         Gandhi road, Kacheri amsom and desom,

         Calicut.

                                                                                                      ORDER

 

By.Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, PRESIDENT

 

            This is a complaint filed under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties.

2. The opposite parties 2,4,5,6 and 7 filed written version denying all the allegations and claims made against them in the complaint.

3. The complainant remained absent and there is no representation for him. The onus is on the complainant to prove the allegations. The complainant is continuously absent and it appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter.

In the result, the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.        

 

Pronounced in open Commission on this, the 30^th day of January, 2024.

 

Date of Filing: 18/09/2014

 

 

         Sd/-                                                           Sd/-                                                  Sd/-

       PRESIDENT                                         MEMBER                                       MEMBER

 

 

 

APPENDIX

 

 

 Sd/-                                                           Sd/-                                                  Sd/-

                                             PRESIDENT                                         MEMBER                                       MEMBER

 

                                                                                   

True copy,                                                                                         

                                                                            Sd/-                 

                                                                           Assistant Registrar.