DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II
Udyog Sadan, C-22 & 23, Qutub Institutional Area
(Behind Qutub Hotel), New Delhi-110016
Case No.298/2016
Sh. Roop Khanna
Flat 201, K-62, Hauz Khas Enclave,
New Delhi-110016 ….Complainant
Versus
M/s Unitech Ltd.
Through its Managing Director
6, Community Centre,
Saket New Delhi-110017
Also at:
Unitech House L Block,
South City, Gurgaon-122001
Haryana ….Opposite Parties
Date of Institution : 16.09.2016 Date of Order : 03.10.2018
Coram:
Sh. R.S. Bagri, President
Ms. Naina Bakshi, Member
Ms. Kiran Kaushal, Memer
ORDER
Ms. Naina Bakshi, Member
As per averments made in the complaint, the complainant had invested the following amount in fixed deposit of OP:
Sr. No. | In the name of | FDR No. | Date of investment | Amount Invested (Rs.) | Interest rate (p.a.) | Maturity date |
1. | Roop Khanna | 1017358 | 15.03.111 | 50,000/- | 12% | 05.03.14 |
2. | Roop Khanna | 1213795 | 30.03.13 | 1,00,000/- | 12.50% | 30.03.16 |
3. | Roop Khanna | 1241403 | 08.10.13 | 1,00,000/- | 12.50% | 08.10.16 |
4. | Roop Khanna | 1249134 | 28.02.14 | 90,000/- | 12.50% | 28.02.17 |
Complainant has stated that when the above FDRs were matured for encashment, the staff of the OP on some pretext or the other delayed the making of payment inspite of repeated phone calls to the office, the OP gave an assurance that the money would be paid soon but till date the complainant had not received any amount. The OP had initiated a petition before the Company Law Board and gave not only assurance but also affidavit stating that the OP would make the payment to depositors soon. After about two years of hearing with the Company Law Board, Company Law Board found that the OP was not serious in their assurances to the investors and passed a final order on 04.07.16 stating that the OP’s petition was dismissed and the investors have to move to the court to obtain their money back from the OP. It is stated that the complainant made several phone calls to the Company Law Board for assistance but till date the complainant had not received the amount from the OP. Hence, pleading deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OP the complainant has filed the present complaint with the following reliefs:-
i. to pay the maturity value of the fixed deposits of Rs.50,000/-, Rs. 1,00,000/-, Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.90,000/- alongwith 18% interest.
ii. to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards the physical strain and mental agony suffered by the complainant and his family members (compensation).
iii. to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- towards cost of the petition.
OP has been proceeded exparte.
Complainant has filed his affidavit in exparte evidence.
We have heard the arguments of the complainant and have also gone through the material placed before us.
Photocopies of FDRs are placed on record as Annexure -I to Annexure-IV. The complainant vide letter dated 07.07.16 sent a letter to the FD department of the OP for refund of the money as Annexure-IV. Annexure-VI relates to the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal dated 04.07.16.
Averments made in the complaint and evidence led by the complainant have remained uncontroverted and unchallenged. Hence, there is no reason to disbelieve the version of the complainant.
There is nothing on the record to show that the OP has paid the amounts of the FDR to the complainant. As per the FDR the OP is liable to pay interest @ 12% & 12.50% in FDR. Non-payment of FDR amount amounts to deficiency in service on the part of OP. Therefore, we hold the OP guilty of deficiency in service and accordingly we allow the complaint. The OP is directed to make the payment of Rs.50,000/- alongwith interest @ 12% per annum and Rs.2,90,000/- (Rs.1 lakh, Rs.1 lakh & Rs.90,000) alongwith interest @ 12.50% per annum from the date of their maturity till realization and Rs.25,000/- towards mental agony and harassment undergone by him within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order failing which the OP shall pay interest @ 15% per annum on the above said amount from the date of maturity of the FDR till realization.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the parties as per regulation 21 of the Consumer Protection Regulations. Thereafter files be consigned to record room.
Announced on 03.10.18.