Learned counsel for the parties present. Vide its order dated 16.5.2012, the State Commission has passed the following order:- “Neither the complainant nor any legally authorized representative, on his behalf, has come present, though it is already 2.30 p.m. Even on 04.04.2012 and 26.04.2012, the regular Counsel engaged by the complainant, did not put in appearance, but only the proxy Counsel put in appearance. It appears that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the complaint. The complaint is, accordingly, dismissed in default of appearance of the complainant and for want of prosecution. Certified copy of this order be sent to the parties, free of charge.” Thereafter, an application for restoration of the complaint was moved, which was dismissed on 5.7.2012. The order passed by the State Commission is self explanatory. It clearly goes to show that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his case. The case was fixed for 4.4.2012, 26,4.2012 and 16.5.2012 before the State Commission but the counsel did not care to appear for the complainant. There is delay of 34 days in filing this revision petition. However, in the interest of justice and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, we restore the case before the State Commission, subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent-Unitech Limited directly through demand draft within one month. The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 30.5.2013. The State Commission is further directed to expedite this case. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. | 
