Haryana

StateCommission

CC/616/2018

MRINALIKA RAJVANSHI AND ANOTHER - Complainant(s)

Versus

UNITECH LIMITED AND ANOTHER - Opp.Party(s)

RAVINDER PAL SINGH

08 Mar 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/616/2018
( Date of Filing : 13 Nov 2018 )
 
1. MRINALIKA RAJVANSHI AND ANOTHER
C/O BABU RAM GOYAL GALI PEER WALI, NEAR GEETA BHAWAN SIRSA.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. UNITECH LIMITED AND ANOTHER
H.NO. 6, COMMUNITY CENTRE, SAKET NEW DELHI.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  S . P . Sood PRESIDING MEMBER
  Suresh Chander Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

 

                       Consumer Complaint No.616 of  2018

                                          Date of the Institution:12.11.2018                                            

                                                   Date of Decision:08.03.2022

 

1.      Mrinalika Rajvanshi D/o Shri Kamta Prasad Mittal, C/o Babu Ram Goyal, Gali Peer Wali, Near Geeta Bhawan, Sirsa, Haryana.

2.      Manju Goyal D/o Shri Om Parkash Tantia, C/o Babu Ram Goyal, Gali Peer Wali, Near Geeta Bhawan, Sirsa, Haryana.

                                                                   .….Complainants

 

Versus

 

1.      Unitech Limited, Regd. Office at #6, Community Centre, Saket, New Delhi-110017 through its Managing Director.

          2nd Address:- Unitech Limited, Real Estate Division (Marketing) 5th Floor, Signature Towers, South City-1-NH-8, Gurugram-122001 through its Authorized Signatory.

2.      Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited having its registered office at A-22, 3rd Floor, Green Park, Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi, through its Managing Director.

 

                                                .….Opposite parties

CORAM:    Mr.S.P. Sood, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member.

 

 

Present:-    Mr. R.P. Singh, counsel for the complainants.

                   Mr. Lalit Gupta, Authorized Representative for opposite party No.1.

                   Mr. Shubh Amrit Singh, counsel for opposite party No.2.

 

                                      O R D E R

 

S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

                  

                   Mr. R.P. Singh, counsel for the complainants has made a statement that he may be permitted to withdraw the present complaint with liberty to file a fresh complaint before appropriate authority as per law. His statement in this regard recorded separately.

2.               Present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn, in pursuance of the statement made by learned counsel for the complainants. However, complainants are at liberty to file a fresh complaint before appropriate authority as per law. File be consigned to the records.

 

 

March 08th, 2022                        Suresh Chander Kaushik                S.P. Sood                                                                       Member                                             Judicial Member

                                                    Addl. Bench                                       Addl. Bench          

                                                                       

R.K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[ S . P . Sood]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ Suresh Chander Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.