Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/551/2010

Nitika Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

Unit Trust of India - Opp.Party(s)

17 Sep 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 551 of 2010
1. Nitika SharmaD/o Sh. satish Kumar Sharma Flat No. 231 Ground Floor United CoOperative House Bldg. Socety (Opp. Army Institute Of Law) Sector-68 Mohali Punjab ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Unit Trust of Indiathrough its Managing DirectorC/o UTI Technology Services Ltd.(A Government of India Company)Plot No.-3 Sector-No.-11 CBD Belapur Navi Mumbai-4006142. Branch manager Unit Trust of IndiaGulab Bhawan(Rear Block) 2nd Floor 6, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg New Delhi-1100023. Branch managerUnit Trus of India, SEctor-17 Chandigarh4. UTI Technology Service Ltd.SCO No. 70 First Floor SEctor-20/C Chandigarh through its Executive ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 17 Sep 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

           

                                   

Complaint Case No. 551 of 2010

 

Nikita Sharma

                                                                                                              - Complainant

                                                Versus

 

1.         Unit Trust of India, Navi Mumbai.

2.         Branch Manager, Unit Trust of India, New Delhi

1.                  Branch Manager, Unit Trust of India, Chandigarh.

2.                  UTI Technology Services limited, Chandigarh.

-          Opposite Parties

 

Present:         Sh.Naginder Singh Vashist, Advocate for the complainant.

 

Dated, the 17th day of September, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The learned counsel for complainant has appeared and made statement that he may kindly be allowed to withdraw the present complaint with liberty to file fresh. Accordingly, the complaint is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the complainant to file fresh, as permitted by law. 

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING MEMBER

            LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

                                    2nd MEMBER                                     1st MEMBER



, DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, PRESIDING MEMBER ,