Telangana

Karimnagar

CC86/2014

Chada Ashok - Complainant(s)

Versus

Unique Marcantile India Pvt. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

A. Madhavi

11 Jun 2014

ORDER

1
2
 
Complaint Case No. CC86/2014
 
1. Chada Ashok
S/o. Galreddy age 33 years, Occ: Agrl R/o. 8-1-99, Reddy colony Kattarampur, Karimnagar
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Unique Marcantile India Pvt. Ltd.,
1st Floor, Maruthi complex, SBI Builing complex, Mukarampura , Karimnagar
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. K.DEVI PRASAD PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. E. LAXMI Member
 
For the Complainant:A. Madhavi, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM::AT:: KARIMNAGAR

PRESENT: HON’BLE SRI K. DEVI PRASAD, B.Sc., LL.B., PRESIDENT

WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE   TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

CONSUMER COMPLAINT  NO. 86 OF 2014

Between:-

Chada Ashok, S/o. Gali Reddy, Age 33 years, Occ: Agrl, R/o. H.No.8-1-99, Reddy Colony, Kattarampur of Karimnagar town and district.

                                                       ... Complainant  

     AND

  1. Unique Mercantile India Pvt. Ltd., R/by its Manager, 1st Floor, Maruthi Complex, SBI Building Complex, Mukarampura, Karimnagar.
  2. Unique Mercantile India Pvt. Ltd., R/by its Regional Manager Regional Office, GNR Heights, Above SBI, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
  3. Swayam Lifespaces Pinjarla, Hyderabad, Registered and Corporate Office, tye up with Unique Mercantile India Pvt. Ltd., F-7, Vishal, New Dinesh Hall, Income Tax, Ahmedhabad of Gujarath (State) 380 009-INDIA.

                                                                                                                             … Opposite Party no.1 to 3

          This complaint is coming up before us for hearing on 11-6-2014, in the presence of Smt. A. Madhavi, Advocate for complainant and opposite party no.1 to 3, and on perusing the material papers on record, and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Forum passed the following:

::ORDER::

         Memo filed. Stating the matter is compromised out of court and sought return of documents and requested to dismiss the complaint as not pressed.  Memo accepted. In view of memo C.C is dismissed as compromised and office is directed to return the documents by obtaining Xerox copies. No costs.

        Written and corrected by me, after correction the orders pronounced by us in the open court this the 11th day of June, 2014.

                                                                                                                          Sd/-

                                                                                                                   PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.DEVI PRASAD]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. E. LAXMI]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.