BEFORE THE SOUTH MUMBAI  DISTRICT  CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

                                                                         O.No.

Complaint No.SMF/MUM/CC/17/226

   Date of filing :  07/11/2017                                                                                                     

                                                                           Date of Order:  30/11/2017

Dimple Paresh Sampat,

R/o. Jamnadas Umarsi Building,

Room No.4, Ghatkopar (W),

Mumbai – 400 077.                                             … Complainant.

          V/s.

Union Of India,

Through its General Manager,

(Through Chief Commercial Manager),

Western Railway Headquarters Office,

 Churchgate, Mumbai – 400 020.              ….. Opposite Party

                    Coram:

Shri. G.K. Rathod                :   Hon’ble President

Shri. S.R. Sanap               :   Hon’ble Member

Appearance:  For Complainant –   Adv. Smt.  Qureshi Hina Parveen

O R D E R

PER SHRI. G.K. RATHOD – HON’BLE  PRESIDENT

                             Considering  the contents of the complaint, facts not come under the provision of Consumer Protection Act.  We do not find any substance to admit the case as no reason to show that there is deficiency in service on the part of  Opponent.  Hence complaint is dismissed.  

          sd/-xxx                                                                         sd/-xxx

          (Shri. S.R. Sanap)                                             (Shri.G.K. Rathod)

          Hon’ble  Member                                                  Hon’ble President

Note:-  As the pleadings, affidavit, documents, are in English the order in the proceeding is passed for the better knowledge of the parties in English.

vns