Orissa

Ganjam

CC/133/2022

P. Manjula Patra - Complainant(s)

Versus

Union Bank of India - Opp.Party(s)

For the complainant: Shri Pradeep Kumar Pattanayak, Advocate.

24 Apr 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/133/2022
( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2022 )
 
1. P. Manjula Patra
W/o Late P. Rajeswar Patra, At/Po: Polosara, Chatrapur, Ganjam.
2. P. Swapneswar Patra
S/o Late P. Rajeswar Patra, At/Po: Polosara, Chatrapur, Ganjam.
3. P. Parameswar Patra
At/Po: Polosara, Chatrapur, Ganjam.
4. P. Kartikeswar Patra
S/o Late P. Rajeswar Patra, At/Po: Polosara, Chatrapur, Ganjam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Union Bank of India
represented through the Authorized Officer & Chief Manager, Regional Office, Gayatri Central Plaza, Near Tata Benz Square, Zanana Hospital Road, Berhampur, Ganjam.
2. Branch Manager, Union Bank of India
At/Po: Polosara, Chhatrapur, Ganjam.
3. IndiaFirst Life Insurance Ltd
represented by its Chief Executive, Claims Department, belongs to Union Bank of India (formerly Andhra Bank), At: 12th & 13th Floor, North (C) Wing Tower, 4
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:For the complainant: Shri Pradeep Kumar Pattanayak, Advocate. , Advocate for the Complainant 1
 For the O.P.No.3: Sri Satya Narayan Panda, Advocate., Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 24 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                                DATE OF DISPOSAL: 24.04.2024.

 

 

 

 

 

EXTRACT COPY OF ORDER DATED 24.04.2024.

 

   The O.P.No.3 appeared today. Advocate Sri Satyanarayan Panda filed a Vakalatanama on behalf of the O.P.No.3 and filed written version also. It is accepted. The copy is served to the complainants. The complainant No.3 & 4 filed a “NOT PRESS MEMO” today alongwith their Addhar card through their advocate. The complainant No. 3 & 4 also endorsed that the complainant Nos. 1&2 have no objection if this complaint case is closed on their behalf. The Commission heard and perused the case record. Hence the Commission accepted the not press memo of the complainants. The case is closed. A free copy of the order be supplied to both the parties.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.