Kerala

Kottayam

CC/225/2021

Anitha Philip - Complainant(s)

Versus

Union Bank of India - Opp.Party(s)

Mathew Philip

26 Aug 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/225/2021
( Date of Filing : 30 Sep 2021 )
 
1. Anitha Philip
Desire Nest, Flat No..A1, Vadavathoor P O Kottayam. 686010
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Union Bank of India
Kottayam Branch, Represented by its Branch Manager, CSI Square Sastri Road, Kottayam. 686001
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 26th day of August, 2022

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Sri. K.M. Anto,  Member

 

C C No. 225/2021 (filed on 30-09-2021)

 

Petitioner                                          :         Anitha Philip,

                                                                   Desire Nest, Flat No.A1,

                                                                   Vadavathoor P.O.

                                                                   Kottayam – 686010.

                                                                   (Adv. Mathew Philip)

 

                                                                              Vs.

Opposite Parties                               :         Union Bank of India,

                                                                   Kottayam Branch,

                                                                   Rep. by its Branch Manager,

                                                                   CSI Square, Sastri Road,

                                                                   Kottayam – 686001.

                                                                   (Adv. Agi Joseph)                  

         

O  R  D  E  R

         

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant and opposite party represented.  Counsel for the opposite party submitted that as part of settlement, the opposite parties handed over the documents to the complainant.  Settlement recorded.  Counsel for the opposite party filed a memo stating the details of the documents.  Hence the complaint is disposed as settled.

          Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 26th day of August, 2022

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto,  Member                Sd/-

                                                                             By Order

                                                                                      Assistant Registrar

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.