Haryana

StateCommission

RP/96/2016

HUDA - Complainant(s)

Versus

UMANG MITTAL - Opp.Party(s)

SAURABH SHARMA

13 Feb 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

                                                          Revision Petition No. 96 of 2016

Date of Institution:      21.10.2016

Date of Decision:       13.02.2017

 

Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Estate Officer, II, Sector-34, Gurgaon, Haryana.

…Petitioner-Opposite Party

 

Versus

 

Umang Mittal son of S.K. Mittal, resident of House No.824, Sector-15 Part II, Gurgaon.

…Respondent-Complainant

 

 

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

                         

 

Present:     Mr. Saurabh Sharma, counsel for the petitioner

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Authorized Representative of respondent.            

                            

O R D E R

 

 NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

          Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that this revision petition be dismissed as infructuous because the complaint titled ‘Umang Mittal Vs. HUDA’ has already been decided by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gurgaon on 08^th February, 2017.

2.      It is ordered accordingly.

         

Announced 13.02.2017

(Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member

(Balbir Singh) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

  D.R.