Haryana

Panchkula

CC/177/2021

PAYAL RANI. - Complainant(s)

Versus

ULTIMATE AUTOMOBILES PVT.LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

DR.KANU SHARMA

13 Jul 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.

                              

Consumer Complaint No.	:	177 of 2021
Date of Institution	:	10.03.2021
Date of Decision	:	13.07.2021

 

Payal Rani, 47 wife of Suresh Kumar Mittal, resident of House No.494, Phase-2, Housing Board Baddi, Haryana..

                                                                                  ……...Complainant

          Versus

1.   Ultimate Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Having its office at Industrial Area, Phase-II, Panchkula.

2.   Ultimate Hyundai Pvt. Ltd. having its office at Industrial Area Phase-I, Chandigarh.

3.   HYUNDAI Motors India Ltd. having office at SIPCOT Industrial Park, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram, District Tamil Nadu.

                     ….….Opposite Parties

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Before:         Shri Satpal, President.

Dr.Pawan Kumar Saini, Member.

                     Dr.Sushma Garg, Member.

 

Present:        Dr. Kanu Sharma, Advocate, counsel for the complainant.

                     Shri Satpal Dhamija, Advocate, counsel for the Ops No.1 and 2.

 

          Today, the case is fixed for amicable settlement between the parties, if any and for presence of OP No.3. Ld. Counsel for the OPs No.1 and 2, by making a separate statement, placed on record the copy of E-mail dated 20.04.2021, sent by the OP No.2 to the complainant along with the copy of estimate pertaining to the vehicle bearing No.HP-93-0430 as Mark ‘A’ & Mark ‘B’. Further on the instructions of OP No. 2, it is stated that the complainant has been conveyed vide E-mail dated 20.04.2021, about the total repair estimate of the vehicle bearing No.HP-93-0430 i.e. Rs.28,432/- and that the OP No.2 is ready to settle the dispute, in case, a sum of Rs.15,000/- is deposited by the complainant in advance and the balance amount i.e. Rs.13,432/- is paid at the time of delivery of the vehicle. The necessary repair work shall be carried out qua crankshaft as shown in the estimate at Sr. No.13. Rest of the articles/items as mentioned in the estimate as Mark ‘B’ shall be replaced with the new one. The warranty of the replaced new parts shall be 6 months or 10,000 KM, whichever is earlier. The total time in the repair of the vehicle shall be about 30 days. A copy of the E-mail dated 20.04.2021, is placed on record as Mark ‘A’ and estimate details as Mark ‘B’. The repair shall be carried out subject to the satisfaction of the complainant.

          On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for the complainant on the instructions of the complainant, by making a separate statement, stated that  complainant has been made aware about the aforesaid statement made by Shri Satpal Dhamija, Advocate, counsel for the OPs No.1 & 2 and she has agreed with the statement that she will deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- in advance within a week from today with the OP no.2 and the balance amount i.e. Rs.13,432/- shall be paid to OP No.2 at the time of delivery of the vehicle in question and in view of the statement made by Shri Satpal Dhamija, Advocate, counsel for the Ops No.1 and 2, she withdraws the present complaint.

          Heard. In view of the statement made by both the parties, the present Consumer Complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that both the parties shall be bound by their respective separate statements.

                     A copy of this order be sent to the parties, free of costs and File be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

 

Dt.                (Dr.SushmaGarg)            (Dr.Pawan Kumar Saini)            (Satpal)

13.07.2021     Member                          Member                                    President