Haryana

StateCommission

A/30/2022

DIDAR SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

UIIC AND OTHERS - Opp.Party(s)

SETHI KUMAR

10 Jul 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                         

                                                          Date of Institution: 02.02.2022

                                                          Date of final hearing:10.07.2024

                                                          Date of Pronouncement: 10.07.2024

 

 

FIRST APPEAL NO.30 OF 2022

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

Didar Singh aged about 64 years son of Shri Mara Singh R/o Village Khaspur, Post Office Shekhan, District Ambala.

 

 

                                      ….Appellant

Versus

 

 

 

1. The United India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Bal Bhawan Road, Polytechnic Chowk, Ambala City, District Ambala through its Branch Manager.
2. Shri Gopal Krishan Director of M/s Matrix Insurance Surveyors and Loss Assessors, SCO No.92, 2^nd Floor, Swastik Vihar Mansa Devi Complex, Sector-5, Panchkula (Haryana).
3. Magma Finance Limited, 167/18, 2^nd Floor, Sadar Bazar, Near Ambala Club, Ambala Cantt, through its Manager.

 

....Respondents

 

         

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President

                   Mr. s.p. sood, judicial member

                   MS. MANJULA, MEMBER

                  

 

Present:     Shri Sethi Kumar, counsel for the appellant.

                   Ms. Hempushpa, proxy counsel for Shri Sandeep Suri, counsel for respondent No.1.

                   Ms. Shine Parveen, as authorized representative of respondent No.2.

                   None for respondent No.3.

 

 

 

 

PER: T.P.S. MANN, J.

 

ORDER

 

 

1. Authorized representative of respondent No.2 states that the appellant who is complainant in the case has already received an amount of Rs.2,40,000/- and no more amount is due any more. In order to establish her identity, authorized representative of respondent No.2 has filed copy of aadhar card, which is taken on record.
2. Counsel for the appellant states that in view of the amount having been received by the appellant, he does not wish to continue with the present appeal. So, he may be allowed to withdraw the same.
3. In view of the above, the appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied.
4. Application(s) pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.
5. A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the law. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
6. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

                                                                                       (T.P.S. MANN)

                                                                                      PRESIDENT

 

 

                                                                                      (S.P. SOOD)

JUDICIAL MAMBER

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                (MANJULA)

                                                                                      MEMBER 

 

Pronounced On: 10.07.2024

MS