Notice served upon the learned counsel for the petitioner No. 1 through registered A.D. on 25.2.2013.  30 days’ time has elapsed.  Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner is deemed to have been served in this case.

-2-

This case pertains to theft of electricity as is apparent from paras 3 and 5 of the objection raised by the complainant in its reply filed before the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

In view of the Supreme Court authority reported in U.P. Power Corporation Limited & Ors. vs. Anis Ahmed, (2013) 8 SCC 491,  this Commission has no jurisdiction to try this case.  The revision petition filed by the petitioner is, therefore, dismissed.  He is, however, given liberty to approach the appropriate forum for getting Redressal of his grievances as per law.