Haryana

StateCommission

A/611/2015

KRISHNA KUMARI - Complainant(s)

Versus

UHBVNL - Opp.Party(s)

GAURAV DEEP GOEL

24 Dec 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                      

                                       First Appeal No.           611 of 2015

                                                Date of Institution        17.07.2015

                                                 Date of Decision                   24.12.2015

 

 

Krishna Kumari wife of Sh. Tara Chand, resident of 66, Sector 13, Karnal.

                                      Appellant-Complainant

Versus

 

1.      Sub Divisional Officer, UHBVNL, Model Town, Karnal.

 

2.      UHBVNL, Model Town, Karnal, Opposite Party No.1.

Respondents-Opposite Parties

 

 

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

                                                                                                               

 

For the parties:   Smt. Krishna Kumari-appellant in person with Sh. Gauravdeep Goel, Advocate

                             Sh. Yowan Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.

 

                                                   O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          Challenge is to the orders dated December 24^th, 2014 and January 23^rd, 2015 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Karnal (for short, ‘District Forum’).

2.      Vide order dated December 24^th, 2014, the complaint titled Smt. Krishna Kumari Versus Sub Divisional Officer, U.H.B.V.N.L and another was dismissed as withdrawn on the statement of learned counsel for Smt. Krishna Kumar- complainant.  An application was moved by the complainant to summon file and decide the complaint on merits but the same was also dismissed by order dated January 23^rd, 2015.

3.      Learned counsel for the complainant has urged that only relief sought is that she may be permitted to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the District Forum, Karnal. 

4.      Learned counsel for the respondents has fairly conceded that he has no objection in granting permission to the complainant to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action.

5.      In view of above, the appeal is disposed of with liberty to the complainant to file fresh complaint before the District Forum on the same cause of action.

 

 

December 24th, 2015

Diwan Singh Chauhan Member

B.M.Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

 

U.K