Haryana

Ambala

EA/38/2011

NITIN CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS PVT LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

UHBVN LTD - Opp.Party(s)

P.S SHARMA

21 Sep 2015

ORDER

                                                                                                      M/s Nitin Chemicals Vs. UHBVNL               Exe.No.38 of 2011

Present:          None for Decree holder.

                        Sh. R.S. Saini, Adv. for JDs.

                        Case called several times since morning but none has put in appearance on behalf of decree holder.  Let the case be taken up at 12.30 P.M.

                                                                         Sd/-                                           Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        21.09.2015                                                                                                                

 

Present:          None for Decree holder.

                        Sh. R.S. Saini, Adv. for JDs.

                        Case taken up at 12.30 P.M.  Case called repeatedly but neither decree holder nor his counsel has put in appearance.  In the interest of justice, the case be again taken up at 3.50 P.M.

                                                                             Sd/-                                     Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        21.09.2015

Present:          None for Decree holder.

                        Sh. R.S. Saini, Adv. for JDs.

                        Case taken up at 3.50 P.M. and called repeatedly but this time also neither decree holder nor his counsel has put in appearance.  Perusal of file reveals that case pertains to the year 2011 and falls in the category of old cases. As such, finding no justification in adjourning the case further, present execution petition is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. Copies of this order be sent to parties concerned, free of costs, as per rules.  File after due compliance be consigned to record room.  

Announced:  21.09.2015.                            Sd/-                                          Sd/-

                                                                Member                                 President

                                                                                                                       


 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.