Haryana

Yamunanagar

CC/289/2016

Sikander Malhotra S/o Faraya Lal Malhotra - Complainant(s)

Versus

UHBVN Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Gaurav Mehta

21 Aug 2018

ORDER

CC No.289 of 2016.

Sikandar vs. UHBVNL.

 

Present:Sh.Gaurav Mehta, Adv. for complainant.

             Sh.Sushil Garg, Adv. for Ops.

           

           The ld. counsel for the complainant made a statement that due to some technical defect he wants to withdraw the present complaint with the liberty to file a fresh complaint.

         Heard.  In view of the statement made by the ld. counsel for the complainant, the present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file a fresh complaint if so advised.  It will be open to the complainant to file an application before the concerned Court/authority under section 14 of the limitation Act for excluding the period spent before this Forum for the purpose of computation of limitation in terms and observations made by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of “Laxmi Engineering Works vs. PSG Industrial Institute 1995(III) SCC P.583”.  File be consigned to record-room after due compliance.

Announced:21.8.2018.                

                                                                                                     President

                                                              Member.   

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.