Haryana

Yamunanagar

EA/4/2016

Gian Singh S/o Inder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

UHBVN Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sushil Kaushal

22 Jun 2017

ORDER

Gian Singh Vs. The SDO (OP) UHBVN

Execution No.4 of 2016

 

Present:          Mr. Sushil Kaushal, Advocate for complainant/DH.

                      Mr. Pankaj Deswal, SDO (OP) along with Shri Balinder Singh,  Advocate.

 

 

                        Today the present execution is fixed for compliance of order/judgment dated 11.12.2015 passed in CC No.848/2013. Shri Pankaj Deswal, SDO (OP) made a statement that tube-well connection of the complainant had already been released and the amount of Rs.6000/- (Rs.5000/- + Rs.1000/-) awarded by this Forum will be adjusted in the account of Shri Gian Singh, in the next coming electricity bill.

                        On the other hand, learned counsel for the DH/complainant made a statement that in view of the statement made by the SDO he does not want pursue further the present execution and withdraw the execution being fully satisfied. Statement of both the parties recorded separately.

                        In view of the statement of both the parties the present execution is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied. File be consigned to the record room.

 

Member                      Member                                  President

                                                                                              22.06.2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.