Jharkhand

Purbi Singhbhum

CC/114/2009

Vinay Kumar Choudhary - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uday Pratap Singh , Branch Manager , HDFC Standard Life Insurance - Opp.Party(s)

08 Jan 2010

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/114/2009
( Date of Filing : 19 Oct 2009 )
 
1. Vinay Kumar Choudhary
106 BN RAF /CRPF , Nepal Building , Telco , Jamshedpur
Purbi Singhbhum
Jharkhand
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Uday Pratap Singh , Branch Manager , HDFC Standard Life Insurance
Sakchi , Jamshedpur
Purbi Singhbhum
Jharkhand
2. MS Mahua Chatterjee, Operation Head , Jharkhand State HDFC Standard Life Insurance
Sakchi , Jamshedpur
Purbi Singhbhum
Jharkhand
3. Smt. Anjali Jain , Grievance redressal Officer, HDFC Standard Life Insurance
5th Floor , Eureka Towers , Mind Space Complex , Link Road , Malad , Mumbai
Mumbai
Mumbai
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Mr. Ramanuj Narayan PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Mr. S.C . Mishra MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Jan 2010
Final Order / Judgement

The complainant is absent . The complainant is in CRPF and he is a officer and posted as Nepal Building Tower , Jamshedpur . He has filed the complainant against HDFC and the case is limited to the grievances of demanding extra premium of Rs. 4752/- . As the complainant is posted in Armed Forces and he had got extra risk .Earlier the complainant had paid the charges for term insurance and for critical illness rider insurance , but he was sent a notice to deposit Rs. 4752/- as extra premium on the ground of his profession having more risk. It is also further case that the complainant had submitted that he had received back the premium . The grievance of the complainant is that the Op has been discriminating the consumers on the ground of general risk and extra risk being in Armed Forces , but as the complainant had received back the premium he did not continue to be a consumer , hence the members have taken the view that the complainant is no more the consumer of the O.P. and hence this case is not entertainable and this complainant is rejected under Sec. 12(3) of the Consumer Protection Act . 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Mr. Ramanuj Narayan]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Mr. S.C . Mishra]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.