Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/142/2014

K. KANNAPPAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

UCO BANK, THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

N. SURESH AND G. BABY

23 Aug 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                    BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT

                                                        Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER                       

                                                        Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 142/2014

(Against the order in C.C. No. 57/2010, dated 20.3.2014, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Cuddalore)

 

                                                            DATED THIS THE 23^rd   DAY OF AUGUST 2022

 

K.Kannappan,

S/o Kandasamy,

No. 43, Rettai Pillaiyar koil street,

Pudupalayam,

Cuddalore – 1                                                   ..Appellant /complainant

 

                                       Vs

 

1. The Deputy General Manager,

UCO Bank,

Zonal office,

Chennai – 1

 

2. The Branch Manager,

UCO Bank,

Cuddalore – 1                                                  ..Respondents/Respondents

 

Counsel for the Appellant /complainant         : M/s N.Suresh & G.Baby

Counsel for Respondents 1 and 2                 :  M/s V.Suthakar

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission  made the following order in  open court :

                                                 

                                                                        Docket order

 

          No representation for appellant. Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for arguments in list or for dismissal. Today when the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present hence passed over and called again  at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

         Sd/-                                                     Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL       S.KARUPPIAH                                              R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                         JUDL.MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT