Delhi

East Delhi

CC/299/2015

RAJVEER - Complainant(s)

Versus

U.I.C - Opp.Party(s)

22 Jul 2016

ORDER

Convenient Shopping Centre, Saini Enclave, DELHI -110092
DELHI EAST
 
Complaint Case No. CC/299/2015
 
1. RAJVEER
R/O G-10,AKASH BHARTI APP.24,I.P EXTN.PATPARGANG DELHI-92
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. U.I.C
OFF.10,RAJ BLOCK,G.T ROAD,WALRAJ MANDIR,EAST DELHI-92
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SUKHDEV.SINGH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dr.P.N Tiwari MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS HARPREET KAUR MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 22 Jul 2016
Final Order / Judgement

                 DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM EAST Govt of NCT Delhi

                  CONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, 1st FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI 110092  

                                                                                                   Consumer complaint no. -     299/2015

                                                                                                   Date of Institution      -      05/05/2015

                                                                                                   Date of Order         -           22/07/2016                                                                                    

In matter of

Mr Rajveer Singh, adult   

s/o Sh Bhagwan Singh

R/o- G-10, Akash Bharti Apprt,

Plot no.- 24,IP Extn.,

Patpargunj, Delhi- 110092. ……………………………………..…………….Complainant                                                                  

                                                                       Vs

The Manager

United India Insurance Co.,

10, Raj Block, Nr. Balraj Mandir  

G T Road, Shahdara, Delhi-110032 ……..……….…………………….Respondent

 

Complainant’s Advocate       - Sh Rajesh Kumar Sharma

Opponent’s Advocate         - Ex Parte

 

Quorum      Shri  Sukhdev  Singh          President

                     Dr P N Tiwari                      Member

                     Mrs Harpreet Kaur             Member    

                                                                                            

 

Order by Dr P N Tiwari, Member  

Brief Facts of the case                                                                                        

Complainant is having mediclaim policy from OP since 2007 onward. He has submitted that he has never claimed for any ailment since policy was taken for himself and for his wife.

Complaint having Individual Mediclaim Policy from 10/03/2007 to 09/03/2008 vide policy no. 221503/48/06/20/00001169 for himself and for his wife for a sum of Rs 1Lakh each. Thereafter, complainant enhanced his sum assured from one lakh to 1.5Lakh vide policy no 221503/48/07/97/001143 from 11/03/2008 to 09/03/2009. He further renewed his policy from 2009 to 2010 and enhanced sum assured to 1.75 lakh.  The next Insurance Policy was renewed from 2010 to 2011 with enhanced amount to 2.25 Lakh.

Further policy was renewed and a sum assured was enhanced to 2.50 Lakh in 2011 to 2012. Complainant renewed further and enhanced to a sum of Rs 2.75 lakh for 2012 to 2013. Complainant renewed for 2013 to 2014 and enhanced to a sum of Rs 2.75 lakh. The policy was renewed policy vide no 2215032814P111689540 from 18/03/2014 to 17/03/2015.

As per complaint, complainant had some chest infection and got admitted in Mangalam Hospital from 06/02/2015 to 07/02/2015, for one day. As cashless claim was rejected, so he paid his hospital bill Rs 16805/- and submitted his claim to OP which later was rejected u/clause 4.9 of policy terms and condition.

 

 

Aggrieved by rejection of his claim, filed this complaint and claimed hospital bill with 24% interest with Rs 50,000/- as mental agony and harassment. He also claimed Rs 15,000/- as litigation charges.

After scrutinizing complaint and evidence, notice was served. OP did not put his appearance nor submitted written statement or evidences. Despite of giving ample opportunity to OP, when none put up their appearance, case was preceded Ex-Parte. Complainant filed his evidence on affidavit. Case was perused with evidences.

It was seen that the said claim was rejected on the basis of discharge summary from treating hospital which state that “Patient was admitted with case of Acute Bronchitis and conservative treatment was given”. He was a smoker earlier but had left smoking. The treating doctor’s certificate showed that he was diagnosed as a case of Pneumonitis with Hemoptesis. Hence, claim was rejected under Misrepresentation of Facts under clause 4.9 which reads as taking Alcohol besides other heads.

It is clear from the duration of policies from 2007 to the claim period, complainant had not claimed. More so, mere mentioning of “Occasional taking Alcohol” had no findings in treatment papers nor was any side effect detected. Though, Acute Bronchitis was current diagnosis but hymoptesis is not seen in Acute Bronchitis. It mainly present in Active stage of Pulmonary Tuberculosis and superadded infection in TB is Bronchiectasis.  

 

 

OP has not correctly and appropriately processed the claim. Alcohol has no relation with current diagnosis. As the policies were of more than four years old and were continue without claim, the pre existing ailments get covered thereafter.

Here, OP was Ex-parte, hence, taking the merit of evidence, filed by the complainant on affidavit, which are on record, the present complaint deserve to be allowed.

We pass the following order-

OP is directed to pay the hospital bill a sum of Rs 16,805/- with 9% interest from the date of filing this complaint, till realization. We further award compensation a sum of Rs 5000/- for harassment, mental agony and pain. In addition to this a sum of Rs 1000/- is awarded as litigation charges.        

The order copy be sent to the parties as per act and file be consigned to the record room.

 

 Mrs Harpreet Kaur- Member                                              (Dr) P N Tiwari - Member                                                          

                                       

                                         Shri  Sukhdev Singh - President

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SUKHDEV.SINGH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dr.P.N Tiwari]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS HARPREET KAUR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.