Haryana

Panipat

CC/208/2023

Sunita Devi - Complainant(s)

Versus

U.H.B.V.N. - Opp.Party(s)

Shri Subhash Shelat

16 Oct 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/208/2023
( Date of Filing : 15 Jun 2023 )
 
1. Sunita Devi
Wife of Sh. Satish Kumar Verma resident of Ram Nagar- Bharat Nagar, Tehsil and Distt. Panipat. age about 55 years.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. U.H.B.V.N.
Through its S.D.O. 'OP' Sub Division Office, Chhajpur Samalkha, Distt. Panipat.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
  Mr. Vinit Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri Subhash Shelat, Advocate for the complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Shri Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent/opposite party.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 16 Oct 2024
Final Order / Judgement

No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 30.10.2023. No effort has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed six effective opportunities including three last opportunities. Hence, there is no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by the order of this Commission.

2.       This complaint has been filed against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party. In written statement, all the allegations have been denied by the opposite party and dismissed of the complaint was prayed for.

3.       As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.       This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room.

 
 
[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Mr. Vinit Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.