Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/2007/431

Smt Saida Husain - Complainant(s)

Versus

U I I Co - Opp.Party(s)

Ashok Mehrotra

17 Sep 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/2007/431
( Date of Filing : 27 Feb 2007 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)
 
1. Smt Saida Husain
a
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. U I I Co
a
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SUSHIL KUMAR PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SUDHA UPADHYAY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Sep 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Oral

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

U.P. Lucknow.

Appeal no.431/2007

Smt. Saida Husain vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.                                          

ORDER

(Delivered by Sri Sushil Kumar, Member)

17.9.2024

Case called out. Heard ld. counsel for the appellant Sri T.H. Naqvi and ld. counsel for the respondent Ms. Mandvi Mehrotra.

This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 10.1.2007 passed by ld. District Consumer Forum, Raebareli in complaint no.90 of 2003, Smt. Saida Husain vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. whereby the complaint was rejected on the ground that the complainant has already received Rs.1,42,000.00 as full and final settlement of the compensation.

Ld. counsel for the appellant submitted that discharge voucher is a false and fabricated document created by the officials of the insurance co. for which a FIR was lodged against the concerned officials of the insurance co. but no result of investigation is available on record. Therefore, the bench is unable to give any opinion on lodging of FIR unless the result is available on record.

As provision of section 63 of the Indian Contract Act, when the promise received the less amount than the amount claimed by him then the liability of promiser is discharged.

Since the complainant has received Rs.1,42,000.00 in full and final payment of the compensation, therefore, there is no occasion to file a consumer complaint. Therefore, the judgment passed by the ld. District Consumer Forum is perfect and needs no interference.

The appeal is dismissed.

The stenographer is requested to upload this order on the Website of this Commission today itself. 

Certified copy of this judgment be provided to the parties as per rules.

 

      (Sudha Upadhyay)                             (Sushil Kumar)    

            Member                                     Presiding Member

Jafri, PA I/Court 2

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SUSHIL KUMAR]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SUDHA UPADHYAY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.