Assam

Dibrugarh

CC/16/2018

SRI RUHINI GOGOI - Complainant(s)

Versus

TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

SRI PREM PRAKASH MISHRA

01 Aug 2023

ORDER

FINAL ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DIBRUGARH
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/2018
( Date of Filing : 03 Nov 2018 )
 
1. SRI RUHINI GOGOI
R/O LAKHOWA, P.O.- MOUT GAON, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, SIVASAGAR- 785686
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTD.
PLOT NO 1, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA, RAM NAGAR TALUK BANGALORE, BENGALURU KARNATAKA, 562109
2. BORAH MOTOR PVT LTD,
BORAH TOYOTA, N.H.-37 KUMARANISHINGA, NEW TEKLA GAON, 786008
DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
3. CUSTOMER SERVICE DIVISION TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTD,
PLOT NO.1, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA, P.O.- BIDADI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, KARNATAKA, PIN-562109
4. GARGYA AUTOCITY PVT LTD.
GARGYA TOYOTA, NH-37, OPP DTO OFFICE, BETKUCHI, KAMRUP, GUWAHATI- 781034
5. INDIAN BANK NAZIRA BRANCH
REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, P.O.- NAZIRA
SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
6. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.
MOTOR DEALERS DIVISION, 6th FLOOR KRISHI BHAWAN, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, HUSTON CIRCLE, BENGULURU, KARNATAKA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  SHRI P. R. KOTOKY PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 Neelam Kar, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Miss Runjun Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Neelam Kar, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 01 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Complainant is absent without any step. O.P. No.1, 2 & 3 are present through their advocate. This case is long pending for evidence of complainant since 29/09/2021. Ld. Advocate for the complainant took adjournment on four consecutive dates for filing evidence. At last on 08/04/2022 Ld. Advocate for the complainant by filing Pet. No. 60/22 informed the Court that the complainant has not responded to the repeated telephone calls of his advocate for which he wanted to withdraw his vakalatnama from this complaint case. Allowing the prayer of the Pet. Of the Ld. Advocate for the complainant, this Commission vide order dated 23/05/2022 was pleased to issue a notice of appearance to the complainant informing him the next date fixed and the withdrawal of vakalatnama  by his advocate and H/A cum B/A was asked to take steps of notice. Notice was accordingly issued on 23/05/2022 and 29/06/2022. But the complainant has not responded to the notices also. All together ten dates have been passed, but the complainant neither appeared nor took any step. The act and attitude of the complainant reflects his unwillingness to proceed with the case any further. Considering above facts and circumstances this case is dismissed for default of complainant.

CASE DISMISSED

 
 
[ SHRI P. R. KOTOKY]
PRESIDENT
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.