Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/308/2023

The Regional Manager, Agriculture Insurance Company of India - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tmt Saroja, W/o Poduvudai & 2 Others - Opp.Party(s)

M/s T.Ravikumar

28 Apr 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.308/2023

 

(Against the Order dt.20.09.2022 made in C.C. No.02/2020 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Tiruvarur)

DATED THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2023

 

The Regional Manager,

Agriculture Insurance Company of India,

Old No.156, New No.353,

1st Floor, Andhra Insurance Buildings,

Thambu Chetty Street,

Chennai – 600 001.                                                     .. Appellant / 3rd Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

1. Tmt. Saroja,

W/o. Mr. Podhuvudai,

Munangadu Village,

Thundiakadu Po.,

Tiruthuraipoondi Taluk,

Tiruvarur District – 614 703.                                    .. 1st Respondent / Complainant.  

 

2. The Sectretary,

ZC 89, Idumbavanam Primary Agriculture Credit Society,

Idumbavanam – 614 703,

Tiruthuraipoondi Taluk,

Tiruvarur District.

 

3. The General Manager,

Kumbakonam Central Co-operative Bank,

Head Office:

Nageswaran Koil Street,

Kumbakonam – 612 001.                     .. Respondents 2 & 3 / Opposite parties 1 & 2.

 

Counsel for Appellant / 3rd Opposite party    : M/s. T. Ravikumar

      

                This appeal coming up before us on 28.04.2023 for appropriate orders with regard to the withdrawal memo filed by the appellant and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

Appellant / 3rd Opposite party present.   

When the matter is taken up for consideration, the Counsel for the Appellant / 3rd Opposite party stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties out of this Commission and also has filed a Memo to that effect.   Memo recorded. 

In view of the Memo, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.   The Memo shall form part of the Order.  No order as to cost.

The Appellant / 3rd Opposite party is entitled to the Mandatory deposit.   Hence, the Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit along with accrued interest in favour of the Appellant / 3rd Opposite party.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.