Punjab

SAS Nagar Mohali

CC/677/2015

Gurvinder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Times India - Opp.Party(s)

In person

31 Aug 2016

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/677/2015
 
1. Gurvinder Singh
R/o D-202, Aastha Apartments High Land Marg, Zirakpur, Distt,. Mohali Punjab.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Times India
Times India 234, Arcadia Shopping Center, Hiranandini Circle, Hiranandani Estate, Ghodbunder Road, Thane West Thane, Maharastra 400607.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  A.P.S. Rajput PRESIDENT
  Mr. Amrinder Singh MEMBER
  Ms. R.K.Aulakh MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
Present: Complainant in person.
 
For the Opp. Party:
Opposite Party ex-parte.
 
Dated : 31 Aug 2016
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SAHIBZADA AJIT SINGH NAGAR (MOHALI)

                                  Consumer Complaint No.677 of 2015

                                 Date of institution:          21.12.2015

                                                    Date of Decision:             31.08.2016

 

Gurvinder Singh, # D-202, Aastha Apartments, High Land Marg, Zirakpur, District Mohali, Punjab Pin 140603.

                                             ……..Complainant

                                        Versus

 

Times India, 234, Arcadia Shopping Centre, Hiranandini Cicle, Hiranandani Estate, Ghodbunder Road, Thane, West Thane, Maharashtra 400607.

                                                                      ………. Opposite Party

 

Complaint under Section 12 of the

Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

CORAM

 

Shri A.P.S. Rajput, President,

Shri Amrinder Singh Sidhu, Member.

Mrs. R.K. Aulakh, Member.

 

Present:    Complainant in person.

                Opposite Party ex-parte.

 

(Amrinder Singh Sidhu, Member)

 

ORDER

 

                The complainant filed the present complaint pleading that he planned a tour with his family for Bangalore, Mysore and Ooty from 01.01.2016 to 09.01.2016 and for that he was looking for hotels to stay there. Suddenly on 18.11.2015 the complainant received a call from Mobile No.7506824990 for the holiday package and an e-mail ID

 

2.             Notice was sent to the opposite party through e-mail and none having appeared for the Opposite Party, thus, the opposite party was proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 09.06.2016.

3.             Evidence of the complainant consists of his affidavit Ex.CW-1/1 and copies of documents Ex.C-1 to C-7.

4.             We have heard the arguments and also gone through the file of the case.

5.             In order to prove the contents of his complaint, complainant has filed his affidavit which is Ex.C-1/2. The Opposite party has confirmed receipt of payment vide e-mail dated 18.11.2015 titled as order confirmation which is Ex.C-5. So complainant is consumer of the Opposite party as he availed services of the Opposite party for consideration. Further complainant has placed on record e-mail of the Opposite party dated 23.11.2015 vide which it promised that his gift will be dispatched. Thereafter, complainant cancelled the order within lock in period of 10 days as per terms and conditions laid down by the Opposite party which is Ex.C-3. In view of terms and conditions Ex.C-3, the Opposite party is bound to refund the amount of complainant without any deduction as complainant has cancelled the order within lock in period of 10 days.

                During arguments, complainant has admitted that the Opposite party has refunded his amount of payment on 12.01.2016. Now complainant seeks free gift, compensation for harassment and costs of litigation expenses from the Opposite party. As complainant has received refund from the Opposite party so the main issue has been resolved. As far as entitlement of free gift of laptop is concerned, the complainant is not entitled to it because he has cancelled his order and got refund. He will be entitled to free gift only if he would have availed services of the Opposite party after payment. As far as compensation for harassment and costs of litigation is concerned, he is entitled to it because the Opposite party has refunded the amount of payment after a delay of 60 days after filing of this complaint. So the Opposite party is directed to pay an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) as lump sum compensation including litigation expenses to complainant within 45 days failing which the Opposite party will be liable to pay 9% interest from the date of order till its actual payment.

                The arguments on the complaint were heard on 24.08.2016 and the order was reserved. Now the order be communicated to the parties.  Copy of the order be sent to the parties free of cost and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Pronounced.                           

August 31, 2016.  

 

                                                           (A.P.S. Rajput)

President

 

 

                                                        (Amrinder Singh Sidhu)

Member

 

 

(Mrs. R.K. Aulakh)

Member

 
 
[ A.P.S. Rajput]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Mr. Amrinder Singh]
MEMBER
 
[ Ms. R.K.Aulakh]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.