Orissa

Anugul

CC/61/2015

Lambodar Sahu - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tilak De, Chief Post Master General of Odisha - Opp.Party(s)

U.S.Mishra

06 Jul 2023

ORDER

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ANGUL
 
Complaint Case No. CC/61/2015
( Date of Filing : 02 Jun 2015 )
 
1. Lambodar Sahu
At/P.O-Tukuda, P.S-Jarapada, Dist.-Angul
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Tilak De, Chief Post Master General of Odisha
At- Kharabela Nagar, Bhubaneswar-759101.
Khurda
Odisha
2. Jaleswar Kanhar, Post Master General of Odisha
At/P.O/Dist.- Sambalpur-768001.
3. Asst. Director of Postal Services
C/o- Post Master General of Odisha, At/P.O/Dist.- Sambalpur-768001.
4. Superintendent of Post
At- Dhenkanal Division, P.O/P.S/Dist.- Dhenkanal-759001
5. Post Master
At-Post Office, Vill/P.O-Tukuda, P.S- Jarapada, Dist.-Angul
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Saroj Kumar Sahoo PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Sasmita Kumari Rath MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Sri S.K.Sahoo,President.

          One   Lambodar has filed  the present complaint  U/s. 12 of C.P.Act, 1986.

2.       The  case  of the  complainant  is that  Kia  Sahu is his wife  who had insured herself under the Postal Life Insurance Scheme on 02.06.2006 for  Rs.20,000.00. She had paid the monthly premium of Rs.276.00 along with Rs.1.00  as service tax in each month. The opp.party No.5  after  receiving the  premium from Kia Sahu used to issue premium receipt. On 17.08.2009  Kia Sahu  died which was  informed to the opp.parties. The complainant is  now the  claimant of the  sum assured  on the Postal Life Insurance Scheme due to Kia. After receiving the information from the  complainant  , the opp.party No. 4  by his letter dtd. 05.02.2010 instructed the  postal  inspector  to  conduct  an inquiry  regarding the genuineness of the death of Kia. The Inspector  conducted an inquiry   on 08.04.2010   and submitted his  report to opp.party No.3. The Asst. Director of Postal Service who is opp.party No.3   wrote  a letter to opp.party No.4  on 28.09.2011  by sending the   copy of  death certificate of Kia , 31 numbers  of  PLI receipts, letter of the  complainant  and  LI-9   for  verification  and   necessary recommendation  for  sanction of the  claim of the  complainant. Accordingly  opp.party No.4  submitted his  report  which  shows  the genuineness of the  claim  but till  now there   is no  settlement of the  claim in  favour of the  complainant. The opp.party No.5   who received the  premium  has not  issued   any policy to Kia  or  the   complainant  after  the  death of  Kia. So  the  complainant  has   written  several  letters to the opp.parties at  different point of time  but no action was taken  for  settlement  of his claim. Finding  no  other way on 25.11.2014  the  compliant issued  a pleader notice to the  opp.parties by regd. post  bearing Regd. letters No. 1418,1419 & 1420. The opp.party No.4   submitted his reply  by his letter dtd.05.12.2010. By the  said letter the opp.party No.4 informed  that the  opp.parties  are taking necessary steps  for settlement of the  death  claim. Thereafter, the complainant  approached the  opp.parties  for  settlement  of the  claim in several occasions  but till filing of the  complaint the  claim was not settled by the opp.parties. The complainant  is  aged about  68 years, running from pillar to post  for  the  insured  amount of his deceased  wife. Hence this  case.

3.       Notices were  issued to all the  opp.parties through Regd. post with A.Ds. The A.Ds  are available  in the  case record. In pursuance  of notice the opp.party No.4 appeared  before this  Forum/Commission and filed  a  written statement/show cause  on behalf of   all the opp.parties.

4.       The  case of the  opp.parties is that  Kia  Sahu, the wife  of the  complainant   had  proposed a RPLI  policy  for sum assured  of Rs.20,000.00  at Tukuda  Branch  Post office and  deposited the 1st  premium  of  Rs.276.00  at Tukuda  Branch post office vide PLI-2  receipt No.16 dtd.02.06.2006. The   proposal form of Smt. Late Kia Sahu was not  received by  opp.party No.4, for  which  the  said   proposal  could not be accepted by the  competent  authority but late Kia  Sahu  had   deposited  Rs.276.00  per  month from the month of June, 2006  to August, 2009 at Tukuda branch Post office without  receiving  the  acceptance   letter and  policy documents.  She had not made  any  representation   to  opp.party No.4  regarding  non-issuance  of policy  bond   during  his life  time. After  lapse  of  three  years   on 17.08.2009  Kia  Sahu died  and  after  her  death  the  complainant  has filed his  claim for  the sum assured by  submitting the death certificate and 31 numbers  of  premium receipts for the period June, 2006 to August, 2009 . The  claim papers were  verified with  reference to the record available in the office  but the  proposal  form is not  available  at Tukuda branch  post  office, Kishoregang Sub-Post office and the Inspector of Post Office,Angul West Sub-Division. No  proposal form is  pending in the name of  Kia Sahu. The  complainant issued  a legal notice through  advocate. A reply  was given to the  said pleader notice, in which the  complainant  was  informed that there is  difficulties  to settle the  death claim in absence   of policy  bond. As  per the departmental  provisions, in absence of  policy bond death claim  can not be  entertained. Keeping  in  view the   deposit of  premium by Kia regularly, the  competent  authority  issued  an order  for  refund of the  deposited  amount  collected   without  settling  the death  claim. There is no deficiency in service   on the part of the opp.parties and the  complainant   is not  entitled  to get  any  relief. The case may kindly  be  dismissed.

5.       On perusal of case record it transpires that the  complaint filed by the complainant  is supported with affidavit. He has filed the documents which were in his possession. Although the opp.parties filed a written version through opp.party No.4, they have not adduced any evidence. The complainant also did not adduce any evidence during   hearing of the case. So the case is  to be disposed off on basing  on the  pleadings of the  parties and the  documents   relied  on  by them.

6.       Admittedly Late Kia Sahu  had deposited  monthly premium  with the opp.party No.5 under  Postal Life Insurance  Scheme  on  02.06.2006 . It is  also  admitted that she  has deposited  the  monthly  premium under the  said scheme  from 02.06.2006  till August, 2009. It  is also admitted  that on 17.08.2009  the   insured Kia  Sahu  died on and  an inquiry  was  conducted  by  the officials of the opp.parties. In the show cause the opp.parties also admitted the aforesaid  policy. The sum assured was Rs.20,000.00. The complainant has filed the  photo copy of 31 numbers of  the premium receipts  issued by the  opp.party No.5. From the complaint petition , show cause filed by the opp.parties and the  documents filed by both parties it is  clear that the opp.party No.5  accepted the  policy  premium for  about  three  years. The  opp.parties refused to  pay the insured amount on the  ground that the   proposal  form and the  policy bond  were  not issued to Kia Sahu .The opp.parties  admitted in   their  show cause that  policy bond  and  the  proposal form are not  available in their  office. The department of the opp.parties has agreed  to repay the amount received  from Kia Sahu towards premium. The opp.party No.5 in his letter dt. 10.06.2015 issued   to the  complainant and  others has informed the  complainant to receive  an amount of Rs.10,764.00 which was received  from  his  wife  late  Kia Sahu. As the opp.party No.5 has  received the  monthly premium from Kia Sahu from 02.06.2006  till 17.08.2009, it  is   the duty of the opp.parties to  issue the  policy bond to  late Kia Sahu. Not issuing  the  policy bond  to late Kia Sahu within a  reasonable  time is  a gross  deficiency in service  by the opp.parties. As the wife of the  complainant  was paying the  premium regularly  till her death, the  complainant  is entitled  to the sum assured under the  Postal Life Insurance Scheme to Kia Sahu. The opp.parties  can not  escape  from  their  liabilities by telling   that  no  proposal form is  available  and  policy bond has not  been issued  to the   wife of the  complainant. The  complainant  was  forced to  come to the  litigation  for  his genuine claim. He is running to the  Commission  since  last  eight years. Due to the  deficiency in service by the  opp.parties  the  complainant was  subjected to mental agony, stress and strain. The opp.parties are liable  to pay compensation  along  with the due  ,for which  the  complainant is  entitled.

7.        Hence order :-

: O R D E R :

          The case  be  and the  same is allowed  in part on  contest against the all the opp.parties. The opp.parties   are directed to pay an amount of Rs.20,000.00 (Rupees Twenty Thousand)  only  along with  interest @7% per annum from  17.08.2009 until payment  is made. They are further directed to pay an amount of Rs.5,000.00 (Rupees Five Thousand) only towards litigation expenses along  with compensation  an amount of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees Ten Thousand) only towards  mental agony, harassment etc. to the  complainant. The  opp.parties  are directed  to pay the  aforesaid  amounts   within  one month from the date of  receipt of this order, failing which they have to pay penal  interest @ 12% per annum on Rs.20,000.00 (Rupees  Twenty Thousand) only from 17.09.2009 till payment  is made and  penal interest  @ 12%  on the  damage and  litigation  expenses  of Rs.15,000.00 (Rupees Fifteen Thousand ) only   after  one month  of   receipt of  order  till payment is  made.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Saroj Kumar Sahoo]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Sasmita Kumari Rath]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.