Kerala

Trissur

op/04/929

A. P. Jose - Complainant(s)

Versus

Thrissur Corporation - Opp.Party(s)

A.D. Benny

15 Sep 2008

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
AYYANTHOLE
THRISSUR-3
 
Complaint Case No. op/04/929
( Date of Filing : 20 Jul 2004 )
 
1. A. P. Jose
Arangassery (H), Koorkkanchery
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Thrissur Corporation
Rep by Secretary
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Rajani P.S. Member
 HON'BLE MR. Sasidharan M.S Member
 
PRESENT:A.D. Benny, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Johnson. T. Thomas, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 15 Sep 2008
Final Order / Judgement

31/12/2011.

O R D E R

By Sri.M.S.Sasidharan, Member

            The case  of the  complainant  is that the complainant holds  a water connection from the respondents vide consumer No.5254.  The complainant purchased  the property on 1994.  But he constructed the building only  on December 2001.  The complainant had  applied to transfer the water connection.  However the connection has not been transferred even though the   site plan was approved.  So no water was used for the construction.  The complainant began to consume water only after the construction of building on December 2001.  It was told  on March 2004 that   there was  an arrear of Rs.14,000/- to be paid by him.  The arrear amount is requested without any basis and no details are given.  The respondents disconnected the water supply on 26/6/04 illegally.  So this illegal disconnection  amounts to their deficiency in service.  The complainant prayed to set aside  the arrear amount called for.

 

          2. The respondent called absent and  set exparte.

          3. Points for consideration are:

1) Is the complainant entitled to pay the arrear amount called for ?

2) Other reliefs and costs ?

          4. The complainant filed affidavit and the documents submitted in support to his claim are marked as Exhibits P1 to P4.

          5. The complainant’s case is that even though he  purchased the property  in the year 1994 the building was constructed only on December 2001.  Even then he did not use the water from the connection for the construction purpose.  The water connection  has not been transferred in favour of him inspite   of approving the site plan.  So the complainant claimed that he is not liable to pay the arrear amount claimed from him.

 

          6. Exhibit P1 is the occupancy certificate issued from the respondent office on 4/12/2001.  Where as it was informed in Exhibit P4 letter to submit the occupancy certificate failing which the supply will be disconnected.  Exhibit P4 revealed that the complainant had informed that no water was consumed from 1994 to 2001.  But no action has seen taken on the Exhibit P4 request before disconnecting the water supply.

 

          7. There is no other evidence to the contrary.

 

          8. The water connection was restored vide order in IA No.846/04.

 

          9. In the result the complaint is allowed and the notice in which the arrear amount is called for is set aside.  There is no order to cost or compensation.

            Dictated to the Confdl. Asst., transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum this the 31st  day of December 2011.

                                                                             Sd/-

                                                                   M.S.Sasidharan, Member

                                                                             Sd/-

                                                                   Padmini Sudheesh, President    

                                                                             Sd/-

                                                                   Rajani.P.S., Member                                             Appendix

Complainant’s Exhibits

Ext. P1 Occupancy Certificate

Ext. P2 Receipt

Ext. P3 Notice

Ext. P4 Copy of lr. dt.28/5/04

                                                                             Id/-                                                                                                         Member

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Rajani P.S.]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sasidharan M.S]
Member
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.