Kerala

StateCommission

A/10/302

M.S.BABU,THE PROPRITO,GENERAL AUTOMOBILES - Complainant(s)

Versus

THOMAS PV - Opp.Party(s)

DINESH MATHEW

02 Jul 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/10/302
(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/02/2009 in Case No. CC 63/2009 of District Ernakulam)
1. M.S.BABU,THE PROPRITO,GENERAL AUTOMOBILES THE PROPRITO,GENERAL AUTOMOBILES ,THRISSURTHRISSURKERALA ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. THOMAS PV PUTHUSSERY VETTIYADAM HOUSE KARUKUTTY2. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.NEAR KSRTC BUSSTANDANGAMALLY ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

APPEAL.302/2010

ORDER DATED: 2.7.2010

PRESENT

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU            : PRESIDENT

SRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR               : MEMBER

 

The Proprietor,                                            : APPELLANT

M.S.Babu,

General Automobiles,

Thrissur Road, Angamaly.

 

(By Adv.Dinesh Mathew.J.Murikan)

 

    Vs.

 

1. Thomas.P.V.,                                          : RESPONDENTS

     Puthussery Vettiyadan House,

     Karukutty.P.O.

 

2.  Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd.,

     K.V.Varkey Memorial Complex,

     Near K.S.R.T.C. Bus Stand,

     Angamaly.

 

ORDER

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU            : PRESIDENT

 

                                                               

          The appellant is the 1st opposite party/workshop owner in CC 63/2009 in the file of CDRF, Ernakulam.  The appellant is under orders to repair the scooter of the complainant within a month failing which to pay a sum of Rs.5000/- and compensation of Rs.2000/-.

          2. It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that the appellant did not receive notice from the Forum and hence he happened to be absent.  We find that the above submission can not be accepted as such.  The Forum has mentioned that the service of notice has been effected.  All the same in view of the fact  that the appellant has not been heard, the order of the Forum is set aside  on condition that the appellant/1st opposite party pay a sum of Rs.3000/- to the complainant towards cost or deposit the same before the Forum which can be withdrawn by the complainant.  The Forum will issue notice to the complainant and 2nd opposite party and dispose of the case on merits after giving opportunity to the parties to adduce further evidence if they so desire.

          The case stands posted before the Forum on 7.9.2010.

          Office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the Forum urgently.

 

 

          JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU            : PRESIDENT

 

 

          SRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR               : MEMBER

 

ps

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 02 July 2010

[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT