West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/366/2021

Monica Tharad - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Zonal manager, Sahara India Sadan - Opp.Party(s)

Ld.Adv

27 May 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/366/2021
( Date of Filing : 01 Oct 2021 )
 
1. Monica Tharad
Flat 3B, Akshara Apartment, 13/1/1A, Soorah East Road, Akshara Park, Beleghata, Kolkata-700010.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Zonal manager, Sahara India Sadan
2/A, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata, West Bengal-700071.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Ld.Adv, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 27 May 2022
Final Order / Judgement

FINAL ORDER/JUDGEMENT           

SHRI SWAPAN KUMAR MAHANTY,   PRESIDENT

 

The facts, as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it, are that  Sahara Q Gold Mark Ltd.  is a Financial Institution. Complainant invested Rs. 1,70,850/-   against gold coins weighting  about  96.000 gm from  the OP  on 03.07.2012.  OP issued certificate   bearing No.  62514700036  to the complainant.  The maturity period  of gold coins is for 5 years from the date of purchase and it was stipulated in clause 9 of the Gold Bank certificate that the Gold shall deliver to the customer within 30 days  from the receipt of request for delivery after expiry of the stipulated tenure and any delay attributable to the customer for not taking delivery shall attract storage charges in as much as immediate after date of maturity. Complainant issued letter on 28.01.2020. Despite that the OP remained mum and did not make any effort to comply with this stipulation of the Gold Coin Certificate or Gold quantity weighting of 96.000 gm (22 karat) despite several representations of different dates. Having no other alternative, the complainant issued legal notice dated 24.03.2021 to the OP. Despite legal notice the OP did not comply and/or reply the same. Complainant further alleges that there is gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OP.

In view of the gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practices of the OP,  complainant has filed  the instant  consumer complaint seeking payment of matured amount along with compensation and litigation cost.              

Despite service of notice, the OP did not turn up to contest the case by filing WV. Thus, the case runs ex parte against the OP.

 Complainant has filed her evidence supporting the allegations made in the complaint petition. Complainant has also filed various documents in support of her case. Despite several opportunities, OP did not file their WV.

            We have considered the argument of the Ld. Advocate for the complainant and examined the record.

            It is not in dispute that the complainant invested Rs. 1,70,850/-   to the OP  against certificate  bearing No. 62514700036 dated  03.07.2012 and such amount was for purchase of Gold weighting  96.000 gm (22 karat). The investment is for 05 years. On expiry of 05 years, the OP did not deliver gold weighting 96.000 gm to the complainant. Even, they bothered to reply the legal notice dated 24.03.2021 of the complainant.

 OP is fully aware that they are liable to refund redeem gold coins weighting about 96.000 gm (22 karat) or its value of Rs.  4,41,600/-. Despite expiry period of five years, the OP violated clause 09 of terms and conditions of the certificate. Complainant invested her hard earned money with the OP. The OP is  deliberate to make illegal gains and to deprive the complainant from her lawful right. In fact, the OP withhold the gold coin  which no doubt deceitful manner of trade.

OP has not filed their WV  denying the allegations made in the complaint petition. Complainant in her affidavit did support the allegations made out in the complaint. Therefore, it cannot be said that complainant has failed to prove deficiency in service and unfair trade practice of the OP. The act of the OP is a clear case of deception, which resulted in the injury and loss of opportunity to the complainant. Had the complainant not invested her money to the OP, she would have invested the same elsewhere. Complainant cannot be wait indefinitely to get the gold coin weighting 96.000 gm (22 karat). Complainant has suffered mental agony and harassment. It is settled principal of  law that the compensation should be commensurate with loss of suffered and it should be just, fair and reasonable and not arbitrary. In these circumstances, the complainant is entitled to refund weighting 96.000 gm (22 karat) of gold and/or its maturity value of Rs. 4,41,600/- from  Sahara Q Gold Mart Ltd.  along with compensation and litigation cost.

Based on the discussion above, the Consumer Case is allowed  in  part ex parte against the OP with the following directions :-

  1. OP is  directed to pay Rs. 4,41,600/- (Rupees four lacs forty one thousand six hundred) only being the value of gold coins weighting 96.000 gm (22 karat)  to the complainant.
  2. OP  is further directed to pay Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only as compensation to the complainant on account of mental agony and physical harassment.
  3. OP  is also directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five  thousand) only towards litigation cost to the complainant.

The above directions be complied by the OP within a period of 90 days from today. For failure or omission in compliance within the stipulated period, the complainant shall be at liberty to put the order in execution as per CP Act.

Copy of the judgment be supplied to the parties as per rules. Upload the judgment on the website of this Commission for perusal of the parties.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.