Kerala

Idukki

CC/10/73

Rema W/O Sasi - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Village Officer - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.K.M.Sanu

19 Apr 2010

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKIConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Idukki, Kuyilimala, Painavu PO-685603
Complaint Case No. CC/10/73
1. Rema W/O SasiPuthettuthazhathu(H), Ellakkal.P.O, Pallivasal, IdukkiIdukkiKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. The Village OfficerVillage Office, Pallivasal.P.O, IdukkiIdukkiKerala2. The Tahsildar(RR)Devikulam Taluk, DevikulamIdukkiKerala3. The District CollectorCollectorate, Kuyilimala, Painavu.P.OIdukkiKerala ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:
HONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan ,PRESIDENTHONORABLE Sheela Jacob ,MemberHONORABLE Bindu Soman ,Member
PRESENT :Adv.K.M.Sanu, Advocate for Complainant

Dated : 19 Apr 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DATE OF FILING: 19.04.2010


 

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 19th day of April, 2010


 

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER


 

C.C No.73/2010

Between

Complainant : Rema W/o Sasi,

Puthettu Thazhathu House,

Ellackal P.O,

Pallivasal,

Idukki District.

(By Adv: K.M.Sanu)

And

Opposite Parties :

1. The Village Officer,

Village Office,

Pallivasal P.O,

Idukki District.

2. The Tahsildar(LA),

Devikulam Taluk,

Devikulam,

Idukki District.

3. The District Collector,

Collectorate, Idukki,

Painavu P.O, Kuyilimala.

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)


 

Heard. Complaint is regarding the application of pattayam in Pallivasal Village in Devikulam Taluk. We think that distribution of pattayam is a statutory procedure of the Government and the matter will not come under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act. Hence the petition dismissed.

 

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 19th day of April, 2010

Sd/-

SRI. LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)

Sd/-

SMT. SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)

 Sd/-

SMT. BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)

 


[HONORABLE Sheela Jacob] Member[HONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan] PRESIDENT[HONORABLE Bindu Soman] Member