Assam

StateCommission

MA/32/2013

Fr. Mathew Muttumanna - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Unit Trust of India, (Represented by the Managing Director), - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. N. Dhar

21 Nov 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/32/2013
In
Complaint Case No. CC/5/2007
 
1. Fr. Mathew Muttumanna
Son of Late T.E. Chacko, Jagiroad Town (Nijorpahar), P.O. and P.S Jagiroad, Dist. Morigaon,Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Unit Trust of India, (Represented by the Managing Director),
UTI Mutula Fund Corporate Office, Uti Tower, Gn Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai 400051
2. The Manager, UTI AMC (P) Ltd.
Unit Trust of India Financial Centre, Hindustan Building, M. N. Road, P.O. Guwahati 1, P.S. Panbazar,
Kamrup(M)
Assam
3. The Branch Manager, Unit Trust of India Financial Centre
Hindustan Building, M. N. Road, P.O. Guwahati 1, P.S. Panbazar
Kamrup(M)
Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. N. Dhar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. B. Bhagawati,Advocate, for Smt. C. Sarma, Advocate
Dated : 21 Nov 2016
Final Order / Judgement

This is an application for impleadment of Sri Thomas Menamparampil and Sri Mathew Anchukandam as opposite parties in the instant Complaint Case No. C.C. 5/07.

        Heard Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel, appearing for the complainant. Also heard Mr. B. Bhagawati, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties.

        We have perused the statement made on oath in the application so filed, also perused the objection filed by the opposite parties objecting the prayer for impleadment.

        However, after hearing the learned counsel as well as statements made in both the application and objection petition, we are of the considered view that in order to enable the Commission to effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the case, impleadment of the parties is necessary. Accordingly, prayer of impleadment is allowed. The parties newly added, be impleaded as opposite party Nos. 4 and 5.

        Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.