Kerala

StateCommission

CC/15/14

shani shine - Complainant(s)

Versus

the travancore mediacal college hospital - Opp.Party(s)

14 Feb 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/14
( Date of Filing : 24 Feb 2015 )
 
1. shani shine
ppoikayil shine nivas, nedumpana kollam 691576
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. the travancore mediacal college hospital
medicity nh byepass, mylapore, kollam 691002
2. kitty elizabeth mammen
consultant doctor, department of obstetrics , and gynaceologist, kollam 691002
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
  SRI.RANJIT.R MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 14 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

C.C.No.14/2015

JUDGEMENT DATED: 14.02.2023

 

 

PRESENT:

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN 

:

PRESIDENT

SRI. RANJIT  R.

:

MEMBER

SMT. BEENA KUMARY A.

:

MEMBER

SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN

:

MEMBER

 

 

                                               

COMPLAINANT:

 

 

 

 

Shani Shine, W/o Shine T. Mathew, Poikayil Shine Nivas, Nedumpana, Kollam – 691 576

 

 

(by Adv. David Koshy)

 

Vs.

 

 

 

OPPOSITE PARTIES:

 

 

1.

The Travancore Medical College & Hospital, Medicity, NH Bypass, Mylapore, Kollam – 691 002

 

 

(by Adv. Sreejith R.)

 

2.

Dr. Kitty Elizabeth Mammen, Consultant Doctor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecologist, Travancore Medical College & Hospital, Medicity, NH Bypass, Mylapore, Kollam – 691 002

 

 

(by Adv. K. Murlidharan Nair)

 

 

 

 

JUDGEMENT

 

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN: PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

          No representation for the complainant.  Opposite parties represented through counsel.  Since there has been no representation for the complainant consistently over a long period of time, we had ordered the issue of notice to the complainant.  Accordingly notice was issued.  The complainant has been served.  However there is no representation for the complainant today also.  It is obvious that the complainant is no longer interested in prosecuting this complaint.  This complaint is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.

 

 

 

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN 

:

PRESIDENT

RANJIT  R.

:

MEMBER

BEENA KUMARY A.

:

MEMBER

K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN

:

MEMBER

 

 

 

SL

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ SRI.RANJIT.R]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.