Kerala

Idukki

CC/10/100

Safia W/O Yoonuskunju - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Tahsildar - Opp.Party(s)

10 May 2010

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKIConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Idukki, Kuyilimala, Painavu PO-685603
Complaint Case No. CC/10/100
1. Safia W/O YoonuskunjuBlock no.396, Kallar Pattom Colony, Thookkipalam, Idukki ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. The TahsildarUdumbanchola Taluk, Nedumkandam, Idukki ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:
HONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan ,PRESIDENTHONORABLE Sheela Jacob ,MemberHONORABLE Bindu Soman ,Member
PRESENT :

Dated : 10 May 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DATE OF FILING: 10.05.2010


 

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 10th day of May, 2010


 

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER


 

C.C No.100/2010

Between

Complainant : Safiya W/o Yoonuskunju,

Block No.396,

Kallar Pattom Colony,

Thookkupalam – 685 552,

Idukki District.

And

Opposite Parties : 1. The Tahsildar,

Udumbanchola Taluk,

Nedumkandam – 685 553.

2. The Revenue Division Officer,

Devikulam,

Idukki District.

3. The District Collector,

Idukki, Painavu P.O,

Kuyilimala – 685 603.

4. The Village Officer,

Parathodu Village,

Nedumkandam – 685 553.

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)


 

Distribution of pattayam and cancellation of the same, comes under the Government policy. We think that it is not proper to interfere the statutory duty of the Government. The complainant can approach appropriate legal authority for the same. The matter will not comes under the definition of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Hence the petition dismissed.

 

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 10th day of May, 2010Sd/-

SRI. LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)

Sd/-

SMT. SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)

Sd/-

SMT. BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)


 


[HONORABLE Sheela Jacob] Member[HONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan] PRESIDENT[HONORABLE Bindu Soman] Member