Orissa

Rayagada

CC/15/126

Sri Bijay Kumar Mohapatra, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Tahasildar, - Opp.Party(s)

Self

30 May 2016

ORDER

      DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA

         

.                                          C.C. Case  No..   126/ 2015.

                                                           

 P R E S E N T .

Sri Pradeep Kumar Dash, LL.B,                             President.

Smt. Ch.  Nirmala Kumari Raju, LLB,                    Member

Bijaya Kumar Mohapatra,Employment Exchange,Gunupur,Gunupur-765022.Dist. Rayagada,  Odisha.                                                                                                                                                                                                                 …….Complainant

                                                            Vrs.

  1. The Tahasildar, Kujanga, Dist. Jagatsingpur.
  2. The Sub-Collector, Jagatsingpur.                                                                                                                                                                                …..Opp.Parties

Counsel for the parties:                                           

For the complainant: In Person

For the O.P No.1. : Sri Jadumani Biswal &  K.A.Ramachandran and Associate Advocate, Rayagada..

For the O.p No.2: None

                                                            JUDGMENT

                        The facts of the complaint  in brief is that  the complainant has purchased a piece of land Ac.0.14  cents from vendor  Sri Nisakar Barik of Bharalo,Dist.Cuttack on dt.24.06.1989  with permission M.C No.70/89 dt.31.05.1989  from Previous Tahasildar, Tirtol and applied for mutation vide Case No.1032/14 dt.s17.7.14 before the Tahasildar, Kujunga and   finally received Mutation Patta on dt.21.2.15  and on scrutinize the Patta it   is a matter of regret that instead of Ac.0.14 cents  out of Ac.0.42 cents  Tahasildar Kujanga has issued Ac.2 and 62 cents in his favour. Hence prayed   to issue order to issue individual Patta in his favour and pay the expenses amount  faRs.2000/- . Hence, this case.

                        Being noticed by this forum the opposite party  No.1 appeared through his advocate and  files written version  inter alia denying the petition allegations on all its material particulars. The O.p No.2 did not appear and  as such he was set exparte. It is submitted by the O.p 1 that the complaint is not coming within the meaning of C.P.Act,1986 U/s 2(1) (d) and also this complaint is hit U/s 11(2) of C.P.Act,1986 as the O.p is not coming within the territorial jurisdiction of this Forum at Rayagada nor cause of action in any form arose within the territorial jurisdiction of this Forum as such this Forum lacks  jurisdiction  and the proceeding is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed.

                        We perused the complaint petition and documents filed by the complainant and heard both the parties.  On perusal of the petition, it reveals that the complaint petition does not come within the meaning of Sec.2(1)(d)  and also this forum no territorial jurisdiction to entertain this complaint as the complaint hit U/s 11(2) of the C.P.Act. Hence, the complaint petition is dismissed having no merit.                                                                 ORDER

                        The complaint petition does not come within the meaning of Sec.2(1)(d)  and also this forum no territorial jurisdiction to entertain this complaint as the complaint hit U/s 11(2) of the C.P.Act. Hence, the complaint petition is dismissed having no merit.                 

            Pronounced in open forum today on this   3rd  day of December,2015 under the seal and signature of this forum.

                         A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements , be forwarded to the parties    free of charge.

 

Member                                                                                               President

Documents relied upon:

By the complainant:

  1. Xerox copy  of  voter Id
  2. Xerox copy of  Patta
  3. Xerox copy of  application vide Misc. Case No.70/89
  4. Xerox copy of Sale deed

 

By the Opp.Party:

  1. Xerox copy of Patta
  2. Xerox copy of Order sheet -2 sheets
  3. Application form for mutation
  4. Form of petition mutations in Govt. estates
  5. Amin report
  6. Notice – 3 Nos.
  7. Istahar
  8. Hazira for hearing of complainant
  9. Xerox copy of  application vide Misc.Case No.70/89
  10. Xerox copy of Sale deed
  11. Copy of Receipt
  12. Copy of Form A – 3 Nos.

 

 

 

                                                                                                 President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.