Telangana

Mahbubnagar

CC/11/35

Mohammed Akbar S/o Fakeer Saheb, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Tahasildar, Mahabubnagar & The District Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Syed Nooruddin

13 Jul 2011

ORDER

                                       BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT MAHABUBNAGAR

Wednesday, the 13th day of July, 2011

                                                           Present:- Sri P. Sridhara Rao, B.Sc., LL.B., President

                                                                           Sri A. Veerupakshi, B.A., LL.B., Member

                                                                            Smt. D. Nirmala, B.Com., LL.B., Member

                                                                         C.C.No.35 Of  2011

Between:

Mohammed Akbar S/o Fakeer Saheb, age: 55 years, R/o H.No.2-6-100/2, 1st Floor, Market Road, Mahabubnagar.                                                                                                                                                                                                              … Complainant

And  

  1. The Tahasildar, Mahabubnagar Mandal and District.

2. The District Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar District.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                …Opposite Parties

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of C.P. Act, 1986 praying to direct the opposite parties to pay an amount of Rs.8,100/- to the complainant and Rs.90,000/- towards mental agony suffered by the complainant with interest from filing of the complaint till realization and also to pay costs of the complaint.   

 This C.C. coming on before us this day in the presence of  Sri Syed Nooruddin, Advocate, Mahabubnagar for the complainant and  Sri P. Bal Reddy, G.P., Mahabubnagar for the opposite parties and having stoodover for consideration till this day, this Forum delivered the following:  

                                                                                                           O R DE R

           Affidavit of the complainant not filed though sufficient time is granted.  There is no representation on behalf of the complainant even on today also. The complainant is also called absent and not evincing any interest to proceed with the matter from the last so many number of adjournment. This itself shows that the complainant himself is not interested to proceed with the matter.  Under the said circumstances, we find that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the record pending.  The complainant is once again called absent.

Hence, the complaint is dismissed U/s 13(2)(c) of C.P. Act.  No costs.

   Pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 13th day of July, 2011.

 

MEMBER                             MEMBER                               PRESIDENT  

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.