Karnataka

Bangalore 4th Additional

CC/10/1530

T.Gangadhar &9 Others - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Superintending Engineer (Elec) - Opp.Party(s)

T.Sreenivasa

04 Aug 2010

ORDER


BEFORE THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN,Ph:22352624
No:8, 7th floor, Sahakara bhavan, Cunningham road, Bangalore- 560052.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/1530

T.Gangadhar &9 Others		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Superintending Engineer (Elec)
2.The General Manager
3.The Regional Provident Fund commissioner		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Anita Shivakumar. K 2. Ganganarsaiah 3. Sri D.Krishnappa

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Advocate for complainant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the complaint with liberty to file a fresh petition. In view of the memo filed, the complainant is permitted to with draw the complaint with liberty to file a fresh complaint. Hence, complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint.




......................Anita Shivakumar. K
......................Ganganarsaiah
......................Sri D.Krishnappa