Kerala

Idukki

CC/08/150

Baby - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Sub Divisional Officer - Opp.Party(s)

28 Oct 2008

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKIConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Idukki, Kuyilimala, Painavu PO-685603
Complaint Case No. CC/08/150
1. BabyThannickal House, Moolamattom P.O, MoolamattomIdukkiKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. The Sub Divisional OfficerTelephones, B.S.N.L, Arakkulam P.O, ThodupuzhaIdukkiKerala2. The Accounts OfficerB.S.N.L, Jyothi Super Bazar, Thodupuzha P.OIdukkiKerala3. The Accounts Officer(Cash)B.S.N.L Bhavan, Cochin - 16 ErnakulamKerala ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:

PRESENT :

Dated : 28 Oct 2008
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 28th day of October, 2008

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER

 

C.C No.150/2008

Between

Complainant : Baby Thannickal,

Thannickal House,

Moolamattom P.O,

Idukki District.

 

And

 

Opposite Parties : 1. The Sub Divisional Officer,

Telephones, B.S.N.L,

Arakkulam P.O, Thodupuzha.

2. The Accounts Officer,

B.S.N.L,

Jyothi Super Bazar,

Thodupuzha P.O.

(By Adv:Sibi Thomas)

3. The Accounts Officer(Cash),

B.S.N.L Bhavan,

Cochin - 16.

 

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT

 

Complainant appeared directly. Opposite party appeared through counsel and filed a cheque for Rs.600/- stating that which is security amount paid by the complainant for telephone No.288143. Complainant submitted that another telephone No.253049 is also surrendered by the complainant and the amount of the security is not refunded. The counsel for the opposite party submitted that the details of the security is not given to the opposite party. The complainant is directed to appear before the opposite party's office with the details of the security deposit of telephone No.253049 of Arakkulam Exchange. The opposite party is directed to refund the amount within 15 days of the application by the complainant. Counsel for the opposite party has undertaken the matter. Hence the petition is dismissed.

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 28th day of October, 2008

 

Sd/-

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)

Sd/-

SMT.SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)

Sd/-

SMT.BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)