Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/13/63

P.B.Abdullakunhi - Complainant(s)

Versus

The State of Kerala - Opp.Party(s)

K.Babuchandran

30 Dec 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/63
 
1. P.B.Abdullakunhi
S/o.Beeran Moideen Haji,Safeena Mansil,Alampady,Muttathody.P.O,
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The State of Kerala
R/by Dist.Collector,Civil Station,Vidyanager
Kasaragod
Kerala
2. The Tahsildar,
Revenue Recovery,Civil Station,Vidyanagar
Kasaragod
Kerala
3. The Executive Engineer
K/S.E.B,Electrical Division
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

D.o.F:22/02/2013

D.o.O:30/12/2013

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                          CC.NO.63/13

                  Dated this, the 30th    day of December 2013

 

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI           : PRESIDENT

SMT.BEENA K.G               : MEMBER

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL    : MEMBER

P.B.Abdulla kunhi,                                              :

S/0  Beeran Moideen Haji,

Safeena Manzil, Alampady,                              :  Complainant

Muttathody Po, Kasaragod.

(Adv.Babuchandran.K)

 

1.The State of Kerala,

   R/by District Collector,Civil Station,             :

    Vidyanagar PO, Kasaragod.

2. The Tahsildar,Revenue Recovery,                :        Opposite parties

    Civil Station,Vidyanagar.

3. The Executive Engineer,KSEB,

     Electrical Division,Kasaragod. Po.                  :

 

                                                                         ORDER        

SMT.P.RAMADEVI       : PRESIDENT

 

    Heard both sides  an issue regarding maintainability of the complaint before this Forum.  The opposite party raised such an issue in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in  U.P.Power Corporation Ltd and others Vs. Anis Ahamad 2013 AIAR(Civil)758 wherein the Apex court hold that a complaint against assessment  made by the assessing officer under Section 126 or against the offences committed under sections 136 to 140 of the Electricity Act would not be maintainable before the  Consumer Forum as per the Consumer Protection Act.  On the side of complainant it is submitted that he would prefer to   take resort before the appropriate Forum and hence such permission to withdraw the complaint  reserving the right to file it before the appropriate Forum.  Hence the complaint  is closed accordingly  reserving the right to bring the subject matter before the appropriate Forum with the benefit of condoning the delay for the period spend before this Forum.

MEMBER                                               MEMBER                                                PRESIDENT

eva              

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.