NCDRC

NCDRC

MA/252/2012

TRAVEL INDIA BUREAU PVT LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE SENIOR TOWN PLANNER HUDA - Opp.Party(s)

M/S.KINGS AND ALLIANCE (ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS)

14 Sep 2012

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 252 OF 2012
 
IN
CC/78/2008
1. TRAVEL INDIA BUREAU PVT LTD
...........Appellants(s)
Versus 
1. THE SENIOR TOWN PLANNER HUDA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. SURESH CHANDRA, MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Ms. Rashi Bansal, Proxy Counsel
For the Respondent :
OP-5 Ms. Ambika Garg, Advocate

Dated : 14 Sep 2012
ORDER

Complainant moved application for deletion of opposite parties No.6 to 10 as they have not been served so far and they are neither necessary nor proper parties in the complaint. Learned counsel for opposite party No.5 has no objection in allowing this application. In such circumstances, I.A. No.252 of 2012 is allowed and opposite parties No. 6 to 10 being proforma parties are deleted from the array of the parties in the complaint. Registry to make note to this effect in the memo of parties. -2- List on 7.12.2012 before the Registrar for completion of pleadings.

 
......................J
K.S. CHAUDHARI
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
SURESH CHANDRA
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.