Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/12/106

Kalanad Mammu Abbas - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Senior Manager (Secretariat) - Opp.Party(s)

19 Jul 2012

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/106
 
1. Kalanad Mammu Abbas
Near New Bus Stand Road, Kalanad.671317
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Senior Manager (Secretariat)
M/s. Ponni sugars (Erode)Ltd, Perungudi, Chennai. 600096
Chennai
Tamilnadu
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE P.Ramadevi Member
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

D.o.F:16/4/12

D.o.O:19/7/12

 IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                             CC.No.106 /2012

                        Dated this, the 19th  day of July 2012

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                 : PRESIDENT

SMT.RAMADEVI.P                       : MEMBER   

SMT.BEENA.K.G                               : MEMBER

 

Kalanad Mammu Abbas,

Near New Busstand Road, Kalanad,             : Complainant

Po.Kalanad, Kasaragod. Dt.

(IN PERSON)

The Senior Manager(Secretariat)

M/s Ponni  Sugars (Erode) Ltd,                     : Opposite party

Perungudi, Chennai 600096.

 

ORDER

 

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ : PRESIDENT

 

          Bereft of unnecessaries the case of the complainant is that he is a   shareholder of the opposite party company and holding 80 shares and since 2004 -05 he is not getting dividend and the opposite party is not furnishing any information about his shares, dividend and share value etc .  Hence the complaint.

2.  Opposite party filed their version by registered post.  In the version it is submitted that they had paid the dividend ` 80/- due to the complainant for the year 2004-05     in 2011.

  Complainant heard and  version and documents of opposite party perused.  In version the opposite party has stated that complainant is holding 80  shares in their company vide  folio No E 50092 and dividend for  2004-05 is paid,  But the version is silent about the  future years dividend, the share value etc. Opposite party has no case that the complainant is not entitled for the dividend for the future years from 2005 to 2012.

     Therefore the complaint is allowed and opposite party is directed to pay the dividend due to the complainant from 2005 to 2012.  They are also directed to furnish  detailed statement showing the value of the shares, present market value of the shares and the dividend he is entitled .  Time for compliance is 30  days from the date of receipt of copy of the order.  Failing which they shall  be liable to pay a compensation of  ` 5000/- to the complainant.  There is no order as to costs.

Sd/                                                               Sd/                                             Sd/

MEMBER                                            MEMBER                                PRESIDENT

eva                                                               /Forwarded by Order/

 

                                                              SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE P.Ramadevi]
Member
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.